On Mon, October 30, 2006 8:43 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Is there any support planned for fstatfs and friends within APR?
It's very unlikely unless you submit any patches, but you should know
that. ;-)
Indeed :)
But, what information are you looking to get?
I am looking for a way
On 10/30/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the win32 part that I am most interested in - I don't want to come up
with an API and find win32 doesn't support it without a change to the API.
Does anyone know what the equivalent function is on win32 so I can do some
more digging?
On Mon, October 30, 2006 10:52 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/fileio/fs/getdiskfreespaceex.asp
For disk space, you can use GetDiskFreeSpaceEx(). -- justin
Thanks - will investigate.
Regards,
Graham
--
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, October 30, 2006 8:43 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
But, what information are you looking to get?
I am looking for a way to determine, given a file, whether sufficient
space exists on the drive to write the file, before that file is
processed, and it looks
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well, seeing as any test you do will be befuddled by file compression on the
volume you are writing and that trusting this information is foolhardy if there
are multiple users of the device, I'd ask you to rethink the design before you
create yet another set of My
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well, seeing as any test you do will be befuddled by file compression
on the
volume you are writing and that trusting this information is foolhardy
if there
are multiple users of the device, I'd ask you to rethink the design
before you
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It seems that a more effective high-water mark is to set an upper bounds
on the desired cache size.
My understanding is that working out the size of a directory is more
expensive than working out what you have left on a filesystem. Is this
correct?
If it is
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It seems that a more effective high-water mark is to set an upper bounds
on the desired cache size.
My understanding is that working out the size of a directory is more
expensive than working out what you have left on a filesystem. Is this
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My understanding is that working out the size of a directory is more
expensive than working out what you have left on a filesystem. Is this
correct?
Your understanding would vary widely by the filesystem in place. HFS,
NTFS, ufs, etc etc all have different
On 10/26/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any support planned for fstatfs and friends within APR?
It's very unlikely unless you submit any patches, but you should know that. ;-)
But, what information are you looking to get?
statvfs()/fstatvfs() is the more portable
Hi all,
Is there any support planned for fstatfs and friends within APR?
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
