On 05.02.2010 02:15, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Feb 2010, at 6:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Since noone else has replied yet, I'll Cc: this to legal.
This appears to be part of expat, which APR merely bundles.
Your primary port of call should presumably be the expat
developers. Having said that, it
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2010 5:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Nick Kew
| I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
| core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
| bring you under GPL
On 2/4/2010 5:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
>> ]] Nick Kew
>>
>> | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
>> | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
>> | bring you under GPL).
>>
>> It's a sh
On 2/4/2010 5:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
>> ]] Nick Kew
>>
>> | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
>> | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
>> | bring you under GPL).
>>
>> It's a sh
On 04 Feb 2010, at 6:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Since noone else has replied yet, I'll Cc: this to legal.
This appears to be part of expat, which APR merely bundles.
Your primary port of call should presumably be the expat
developers. Having said that, it is indeed included in
APR distributions fr
On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Nick Kew
>
> | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
> | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
> | bring you under GPL).
>
> It's a shell script. It's hardly linked into expat or ap
]] Nick Kew
| I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
| core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
| bring you under GPL).
It's a shell script. It's hardly linked into expat or apr-util and
there's no way it can make the generated binaries fal
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:11:01 -0500 (EST)
Art Cannon wrote:
> Please forgive me if I've reached the wrong list. I apologize. Feel free to
> point me in the proper direction.
>
> I'm curious. There is a GPL licensed file in apr-util.
>
> Why is xml/expat/conftools/missing present? It's licensed
Please forgive me if I've reached the wrong list. I apologize. Feel free to
point me in the proper direction.
I'm curious. There is a GPL licensed file in apr-util.
Why is xml/expat/conftools/missing present? It's licensed under the GPL. Does
that cause apr-util to be licensed under the GPL?
