Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.) I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on the road next week). It would be great to get expat taken care of but I can't volunteer any time on that. If

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.) I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on the road next week).  It would be

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.10.2010 17:45, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.) I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 08.10.2010 17:45, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de  wrote: On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.10.2010 23:47, schrieb Rainer Jung: OK, done so far. First build tests on Solaris look good. I can even do an out of tree build. Building the tests might be broken for Windows and Netware, although I'm not aware of any obvious problem. no, all build fine for NetWare, great! All I

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick: does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x (whether they have time or not)? /me asking dumb question: is it much more work than just copying over from

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick: does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x (whether they have time or not)? /me

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-06 Thread Dan Poirier
On 2010-10-05 at 16:58, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.) I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on the road next

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-05 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: (Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.) I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on the road next week).  It would be great to get expat taken care of but I can't

Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?

2010-10-05 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick: does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x (whether they have time or not)? /me asking dumb question: is it much more work than just copying over from 1.3 ? Gün.