On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:53 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
GDB allows to also get details on the values of variables used, step
through the code etc. You give gdb two arguments, the path to your httpd
binary and the process ID of the CPU consuming process. Once the gdb
prompt is shown, you can
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mike Jakubik
mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:53 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
GDB allows to also get details on the values of variables used, step
through the code etc. You give gdb two arguments, the path to your httpd
binary
Hello,
I have recently discovered while updating my apache22 installation and
subsequently apr1 from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 that mod_jk now causes the apache
server to consume 100% cpu and become unresponsive. I have tried
recompiling mod_jk with the new apr but that did not help. Below is my
environment
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Mike Jakubik
mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com wrote:
Hello,
I have recently discovered while updating my apache22 installation and
subsequently apr1 from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 that mod_jk now causes the apache
server to consume 100% cpu and become unresponsive. I
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:52 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
you updated Apache 2.2.x from 2.2.what to 2.2.what?
2.2.17 to 2.2.18. I can however also reproduce the problem in 2.2.17, it
seems to be specific to the apr version.
(you updated apr 1.4.2 to 1.4.4)
PID USERNAMETHR PRI
On 17.05.2011 23:33, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
I have recently discovered while updating my apache22 installation and
subsequently apr1 from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 that mod_jk now causes the apache
server to consume 100% cpu and become unresponsive. I have tried
recompiling mod_jk with the new apr
Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:08 PM
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk
On 17.05.2011 23:33, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
I have recently discovered while updating my apache22 installation
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:07 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks for the report. Would you mind opening an issues in Bugzilla? You
can choose the Tomcat project and Tomcat Connectors as a component. If
it turns out as an APR bug, we can move the issue there later.
It would be very helpful, if
On 18.05.2011 00:30, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:07 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks for the report. Would you mind opening an issues in Bugzilla? You
can choose the Tomcat project and Tomcat Connectors as a component. If
it turns out as an APR bug, we can move the issue
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:53 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
If you can find pstack, that will be easier. pstack just takes the
process id and writes out the stacks for all threads. My quick search
indicates it pstack should exist for FreeBSD.
There is a port for this but it only support i386
10 matches
Mail list logo