Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The header file defines in apr_private.h are busted and APR won't
build. Here is a glaring example:
Summary of ths solution:
We picked up a bad sed from 4.6-STABLE, which broke this. We then
picked up a subsequent fix, and we build again on daedalus*.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 June 2002 13:53
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The header file defines in apr_private.h are busted and APR won't
build. Here is a glaring example:
Summary of ths solution:
We picked up a bad sed from 4.6-STABLE, which broke this. We then
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*slight complication... during this sed trauma, autoconf 2.53 became
the default autoconf on daedalus, and it doesn't get along well with
APR;
Is that *BSD specific? ac2.53 works fine for me on linux with APR.
perhaps...
The first fun comes
On 28 Jun 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The first fun comes during buildconf processing:
$ ./buildconf
buildconf: checking installation...
buildconf: autoconf version 2.53 (ok)
buildconf: libtool version 1.3.4 (ok)
Copying libtool helper files ...
Creating include/arch/unix/apr_private.h.in
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The header file defines in apr_private.h are busted and APR won't
build. Here is a glaring example:
/* Define if you have the string.h header file. */
/* #undef HAVE_STRING_H */
config.cache seems to have the right value:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried installing local copies of GNU m4 and autoconf 2.13, but the
problem persists. I even tried specifying /usr/local/bin/bash instead
of /bin/sh in configure. Any other ideas to narrow down what broke
it?
By chance, do you have
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried installing local copies of GNU m4 and autoconf 2.13, but the
problem persists. I even tried specifying /usr/local/bin/bash instead
of /bin/sh in configure. Any other ideas to narrow down what
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:17:41PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
talk about PRs coming our way for people upgrading FreeBSD... first,
old builds are suddenly unreliable, and new builds are impossible
without switching to GNU sed!
is this on a fairly recent freebsd -STABLE system? if so,
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:17:41PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
talk about PRs coming our way for people upgrading FreeBSD... first,
old builds are suddenly unreliable, and new builds are impossible
without switching to GNU sed!
is this on a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:53:16PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:17:41PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
talk about PRs coming our way for people upgrading FreeBSD... first,
old builds are suddenly unreliable, and new
10 matches
Mail list logo
