On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:12:43PM -, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> -dnl APR_CHECK_APR_DEFINE( symbol, path_to_apr )
> +dnl APR_CHECK_APR_DEFINE( symbol )
>dnl
>AC_DEFUN(APR_CHECK_APR_DEFINE,[
> -AC_EGREP_CPP(YES_IS_DEFINED, [
> -#include "$2/include/apr.h"
> -#if $1
> -YES_IS_D
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:34:17PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gstein 2002/08/22 13:34:16
>...
> * change the default APR layout to support parallel installation;
> rename the old layout to "classic"
Note that I put this back to the default, after Thom's/Justin's changes
moved t
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 06:33:10AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jerenkrantz2002/08/18 23:33:10
>
> Modified:.CHANGES apr-config.in config.layout configure.in
>buildapr_common.m4 rules.mk.in
> Log:
> - Add parallel-apr layout which confines the 'parall
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:28:03AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > jerenkrantz02/05/14 00:35:58
> >
> > Modified:buildapr_common.m4
> > Log:
> > Add APR_MKDIR_P_CHECK macro based on httpd-2.0's APACHE_MKDIR_P_CHECK.
> >
> > Revisi
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> jerenkrantz02/05/14 00:35:58
>
> Modified:buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> Add APR_MKDIR_P_CHECK macro based on httpd-2.0's APACHE_MKDIR_P_CHECK.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.32 +20 -0 apr/build/apr_common.m4
Are
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:13:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jim 02/03/13 10:13:02
>
> Modified:buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> Fix weird error report... not sure what
> brain damaged shell would misinterpret the current method, but
> this safes it.
>
> Revision
I'm following up...
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:41:12 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > >Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other
> > >usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:41:12 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other
> >usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not to require.
> >I'll back this out since shells that *
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:41:12 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other
>usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not to require.
>I'll back this out since shells that *don't* support it
>are more broken :)
Thanks (wow, that was quick :)
Is
Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other
usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not to require.
I'll back this out since shells that *don't* support it
are more broken :)
Brian Havard wrote:
>
> On 13 Mar 2002 18:13:02 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >jim 02
On 13 Mar 2002 18:13:02 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>jim 02/03/13 10:13:02
>
> Modified:buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> Fix weird error report... not sure what
> brain damaged shell would misinterpret the current method, but
> this safes it.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
>
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:02:10AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > trawick 01/07/04 17:02:10
> >
> > Modified:.configure.in
> >buildapr_common.m4
> > Log:
> > Stop trying to provide cross-process pthread
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:02:10AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 01/07/04 17:02:10
>
> Modified:.configure.in
>buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> Stop trying to provide cross-process pthread mutexes on systems where
> the form of shared memory used
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
> 1.4 +4 -3 apr/build/rules.mk.in
>
> Index: rules.mk.in
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/build/rules.mk.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.3 -
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not entirely true. It worked splendidly on my Linux box (otherwise, I
> wouldn't have committed :-).
I should have said "the build was broken on at least some BSD and some
Linux systems". :-)
-K
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:48:22PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> However, since the build was broken on at least BSD and Linux, and
> Jim's patch makes things work again, it seemed better to apply it and
> *then* figure out if it's the Right Thing. :-)
Not entirely true. It worked s
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> No way. There is zero advantage to doing that. We *are* using
> AC_CHECK_HEADERS' for-loop, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
That was before I saw the current rev... Agreed it doesn't make sense now :)
> The M4 thing is an unrolled recursion over
> a list, basical
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 07:45:18AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> > * configure.in: just call APR_FLAG_HEADERS once. This allows autoconf to
> > loop over the values *once* rather than substituting N loops for header
> > checking. This drops configure's size
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> now APR on Tru64 doesn't think it has stdio.h (sort of; configure
> output says we found it; APR_HAVE_STDIO_H is set to zero); a few other
> header files aren't substituted properly either... work-around
> forthcoming...
>
> yes, this is with a virgin configure.in with no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> gstein 01/02/27 03:34:50
>
> Modified:.configure.in
>buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> * configure.in: just call APR_FLAG_HEADERS once. This allows autoconf to
> loop over the values *once* rather than substituting N loops for h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> gstein 01/02/27 03:34:50
>
> Modified:.configure.in
>buildapr_common.m4
> Log:
> * configure.in: just call APR_FLAG_HEADERS once. This allows autoconf to
> loop over the values *once* rather than substituting N loops for
21 matches
Mail list logo
