Re: imperative workflows (1.1)

2017-07-04 Thread Tal Liron
> > -Steve B > > -Original Message- > From: Ran Ziv [mailto:r...@gigaspaces.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:23 AM > To: dev@ariatosca.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: imperative workflows (1.1) > > Yup. We have given some thought as to how to imple

RE: imperative workflows (1.1)

2017-07-04 Thread Steve Baillargeon
, 2017 4:23 AM To: dev@ariatosca.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: imperative workflows (1.1) Yup. We have given some thought as to how to implement 1.1 workflows including conditional tasks ("on_success"/"on_failure") and it maps well into the workflow engine, but generally

Re: imperative workflows (1.1)

2017-07-04 Thread Ran Ziv
Yup. We have given some thought as to how to implement 1.1 workflows including conditional tasks ("on_success"/"on_failure") and it maps well into the workflow engine, but generally speaking supporting TOSCA 1.1 is not currently a top item. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Tal Liron wrote: > Not

Re: imperative workflows (1.1)

2017-07-03 Thread Tal Liron
Not exactly. We do not support TOSCA 1.1 imperative workflows and it's not on the roadmap. Our current plan is to provide a state-of-the-art TOSCA 1.0 implementation, and we're not at 100% completion yet. That said, we support something we call "custom workflows". They are not defined directly in