Re: Moving to 100% GitHub

I'm confused by the conversation. Are you saying that moving ariatosca.org to ariatosca.incubator.apache.org would increase visibility and contributions? On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > I think what John means is that - migrate http://ariatosca.org

Re: Moving to 100% GitHub

I think what John means is that - migrate http://ariatosca.org to http://ariatosca.incubator.apache.org On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Tal Liron wrote: > We have both a website and a contribution guide. How should we improve > them? > > http://ariatosca.org/ >

Re: Moving to 100% GitHub

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:51 AM Ran Ziv wrote: > I don't think moving the project to Github and the issue of lack of > discussions on the mailing list are related - we need to solve the latter > regardless of the former. > > I disagree Ran. Aria Tosca has no website, has no

Re: Moving to 100% GitHub

Ran, I only heard about this in person from John at ApacheCon -- I have no links for info. For me, when I see a mirrored project on GitHub I am worried about contributing. My first instinct is that it's actually managed elsewhere, which would require registration and some other kind of red tape.

incubator-ariatosca git commit: wip...

Repository: incubator-ariatosca Updated Branches: refs/heads/ARIA-258-Convert-runtime-properties-to-attributes e2f5e25a8 -> ff3d9647d wip... Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ariatosca/repo Commit:

Re: Renaming Old ARIA Repos

+1 Arthur On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Arthur Berezin wrote: > I think it would be nice to redirect the traffic to the right place, > instead of creating broken links, and also to keep the old content for > reference. > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 6:14 PM John D.

Re: Renaming Old ARIA Repos

I think it would be nice to redirect the traffic to the right place, instead of creating broken links, and also to keep the old content for reference. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 6:14 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Is there a real reason for the old repos to continue to exist?

Magic sign-in link for ASF on Slack

Hello! You asked us to send you a magic link for quickly signing in to ASF, using the app. Your wish is our command! Here you go: https://the-asf.slack.com/x-185534614710-186088681122/z-app-162064580615-186893356854-It9VxIAcZz?s=slack Note: Your magic link will expire in 24 hours, and can only

Re: Renaming Old ARIA Repos

Is there a real reason for the old repos to continue to exist? What would be the problem if they were just deleted? John On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 9:28 AM Arthur Berezin wrote: > Hi All, > > > It seems that the old ARIA organization on GitHub from before we moved to >

Re: Renaming Old ARIA Repos

I added a note on top of all the repos some time ago, but I'm still getting asked about this. On Sun, May 21, 2017, 16:53 Ran Ziv wrote: > I'd think simply a huge note on the top of the README would suffice. > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Berezin

Re: Renaming Old ARIA Repos

I'd think simply a huge note on the top of the README would suffice. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Berezin wrote: > Hi All, > > > It seems that the old ARIA organization on GitHub from before we moved to > ASF(https://github.com/aria-tosca-old) are still

Renaming Old ARIA Repos

Hi All, It seems that the old ARIA organization on GitHub from before we moved to ASF(https://github.com/aria-tosca-old) are still creating confusion. I added text "-old" to repo name and changed the description of all repos to point to the new ASF repo. Do you think we should also move all the

incubator-ariatosca git commit: wip

Repository: incubator-ariatosca Updated Branches: refs/heads/ARIA-208-Missing-back-refrences-for-models 85539771c -> 890a2a4a2 wip Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ariatosca/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ariatosca/commit/890a2a4a

Re: New mailing lists

Matej, John etc. - The issue we keep coming back to, and the reason we try to avoid emails, is that discussions on emails are simply much slower than ones on Slack. John, regarding summarizing slack conversations on the mailing list manually - that's possible, but then I feel like we might be

Re: Moving to 100% GitHub

I don't think moving the project to Github and the issue of lack of discussions on the mailing list are related - we need to solve the latter regardless of the former. Tal, I'm not sure how exactly it would increase visibility - The mirror is as visible as the new repository would be..? It could

Re: [UPDATE] Work on ARIA-149: Support intrinsic functions in "dependencies" operation configuration

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:47 AM Tal Liron wrote: > Phew! Everything seems to work now: functions are parsed and evaluated > properly. But there are some changes that require explaining. > > The "configuration" field in OperationTemplate and Operation models is now > a