[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013711#comment-13013711
 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on ARIES-626:
---------------------------------------

Why not having the blueprint extender calling 
   nshandler.getSchemaLocation("http://cxf.apache.org/configuration/beans";) 
in such a case ?

This way, each namespace handler could implement its own logic ?
Especially as most of the namespace handlers i've seen use simple (i.e. self 
contained) schemas, I'm not really sure that complicating the logic is a good 
idea.

Thoughts ?


> Aries blueprint namaspace handler schema with includes
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIES-626
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-626
>             Project: Aries
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Blueprint
>    Affects Versions: 0.4
>            Reporter: Edstrom Johan
>
> If you have a NamespaceHandler implementation where the schema contains 
> xsd:includes, the schema will fail to resolve if you do not have connectivity.
> There is also no way to attach a CatalogResolver or xml-resolver.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to