Hi David,
Isn't CDDL 1.1 an allowed category B license?
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-b
Or did I get something wrong here?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: David Bosschaert [mailto:david.bosscha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 16. Januar 2017 12:09
To:
there:
http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/aries/blueprint/blueprint-parser/1.1.0/
Regards
JB
On 10/09/2013 07:28 AM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Ok, thanks for the information and the link. Now I see 1.2.0 as the current
version for blueprint-core on the download page, however I
Hi,
As the artifacts do not appear on the download page and there are no release
notes:
Is there any way to find out what is fixed/changed/improved in this release?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 7. Oktober 2013 16:44
Hi,
I have combined the patches from ARIES-1063 and ARIES-1065 that allow Blueprint
service implementation to implement the ServiceFactory interface (instead of
the interface provided by the service) and attached it to ARIES-1065. I think
ARIES-1063 can be closed as a duplicate.
Could someone
: Aries #1418
For what it's worth, I can reproduce the test failures locally with a
recent extract from trunk. Deleting the slf4j directories in my local maven
repo doesn't help, disappointingly.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Siano, Stephan stephan.si...@sap.comwrote:
The question is where
Hi,
Is there a timeline (or at least some idea of a timeline) when the current
release issues will be resolved and when blueprint 0.4.1 will be released?
In general I think that the module-release issue which was addressed in various
mails before this (e.g. Jean-Baptiste Onofré's mail from
The question is where this Log4JLogger adapter actually comes from. In the pom
there is only slf4j-simple referenced, so I guess there is some transitive
dependency to slf4j-log4j12 that drags this in.
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Emily Jiang
