[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-03 Thread Timothy Ward
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1 Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 15:14:21 +0100 I've moved the discussion about the solution into a different email thread. You are right about the cause (an Oracle change to the compiler). We don't need the compiler to be strict because

[VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-02 Thread Timothy Ward
This is a vote for the release of the aries util bundle 1.1.1. This is a micro increment to aries util 1.1.0, including a bug fix for a significant issue in the SingleServiceTracker. The staging area is available here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-162/ Tags:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-02 Thread Jeremy Hughes
I see we still have the Aries Util tag awkwardness: http://markmail.org/message/cukixfhhwnza773j (not a release stopper though). Also, I get issues building this with Java 7. Is anyone else getting that? This is the error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

RE: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-02 Thread Timothy Ward
releases after parent is fixed? Tim Ward --- Apache Aries PMC member Enterprise OSGi advocate Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins) --- From: jpjhug...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:06:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-02 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Enterprise OSGi advocate Enterprise OSGi in Action (http://www.manning.com/cummins) --- From: jpjhug...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:06:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1 To: dev@aries.apache.org I see we still have the Aries Util tag

RE: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1

2013-05-02 Thread Timothy Ward
:42:00 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Aries release util-1.1.1 To: dev@aries.apache.org I'd +1 if we know the binaries built with Java 6 test ok with Java 7 JRE. But I can't see that would be very easy to do. On 2 May 2013 12:30, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote: Having