+1
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of JMX that
did not have a wide enough version range in their imports for a couple of
the OSGi imports. There aren't any code changes, just pom.xml changes
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/08/2013 07:03 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of JMX that did
not have a wide enough version range in their imports for a couple of the OSGi
imports. There aren't any code changes, just pom.xml changes
We have 3 binding +1 votes and 2 other +1 votes. This vote passes.
I'll promote the artifacts.
Dan
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of JMX that did
not have a wide enough version range in
+1 (non binding)
Thank you a lot Dan!
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:16 PM, David Bosschaert
david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
David
On 8 February 2013 18:03, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of JMX that did
not have a wide enough version range in their imports for a couple of the OSGi
imports. There aren't any code changes, just pom.xml changes to affect the
imports.
Staging area:
+1 (non binding)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org a écrit :
This is a vote to release 1.1.1 versions of the various parts of JMX that did
not have a wide enough version range in their imports for a couple of the OSGi
imports. There aren't any code changes, just pom.xml
