[RESULT][VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[David Bosschaert]

This vote is now concluded, with
3 binding +1s
1 non-binding +1
one -1 which is not meant to be a veto and was resolved on this thread.

I'll promote the artifacts.

David


On 2 January 2018 at 13:10, David Bosschaert 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
>  +1 Approve the release
>  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[Christian Schneider]

+1

Christian

2018-01-09 11:59 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert :

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to finish this release, but we need one more binding vote. As
> discussed we Dominik, the uber-bundles will not be released any more, and I
> can remove them from SVN going forward.
>
> @PMC members, please cast a vote so we can close this off?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David
>
> On 7 January 2018 at 12:28, David Bosschaert 
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone else voting? We need one more binding vote...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 4 January 2018 at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in
> >> Karaf, but not a big deal).
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> >>> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> >>> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> >>> release and is thus not included in this set.
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> >>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> >>> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> inconsistent
> >>> exceptions
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> >>> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> >>> exceptions
> >>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >>>
> >>> Staging repository:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> >>>
> >>> Please vote:
> >>>
> >>>   +1 Approve the release
> >>>   -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> David Bosschaert
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbono...@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[David Bosschaert]

Anyone else voting? We need one more binding vote...

Cheers,

David

On 4 January 2018 at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in
> Karaf, but not a big deal).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
>> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
>> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
>> release and is thus not included in this set.
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
>> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
>> exceptions
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
>> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
>> exceptions
>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>>   +1 Approve the release
>>   -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (binding)

Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in Karaf, but 
not a big deal).


Regards
JB

On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:

Hi all,

I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
release and is thus not included in this set.

org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
[ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
exceptions

org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
[ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
exceptions
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123

Please vote:

  +1 Approve the release
  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Best regards,

David Bosschaert



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[David Bosschaert]

Here's my +1

David

On 2 January 2018 at 13:10, David Bosschaert 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
>  +1 Approve the release
>  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[David Bosschaert]

Hi Dominik,

Nothing has changed in jmx-api, that's why I didn't release that one.

The jmx-bundle and jmx-blueprint-bundle you are referring to are 'uber'
bundles that are a combination of other bundles. Since we agreed on this
list to do modular releases for Aries JMX [1] these uber bundles aren't
really compatible with that... I guess they can still be released but they
would need some sort of aggregate version number.

Personally I don't see a strong reason to release these aggregate bundles,
as using them is really an OSGi anti-pattern IMHO. However if anyone feels
that these should be released they can be released separately.

@Dominik, I hope your -1 is not a 'veto', if it is please let us know.
Otherwise I think we can continue this release vote and, as mentioned those
bundles can still be released later.

Best regards,

David

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1f870e20c5f13da6dd0995f501e9ee279a30532efa77125203307ecd@%3Cdev.aries.apache.org%3E

On 2 January 2018 at 16:17, Dominik Przybysz  wrote:

> -1
>
> Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should be
> released together in this release.
> I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't
> change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released:
> https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-
> blueprint-bundle/pom.xml
> https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml
>
> 2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon :
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > François
> >
> >
> > Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> > > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> > > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> > > release and is thus not included in this set.
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> > > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> inconsistent
> > > exceptions
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> > > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > > exceptions
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > Staging repository:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > >  +1 Approve the release
> > >  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > David Bosschaert
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam / Regards,
> Dominik Przybysz
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[Dominik Przybysz]

-1

Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should be
released together in this release.
I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't
change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released:
https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-blueprint-bundle/pom.xml
https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml

2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon :

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> François
>
>
> Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> > release and is thus not included in this set.
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> > exceptions
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > exceptions
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> >  +1 Approve the release
> >  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Bosschaert
> >
>
>


-- 
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Dominik Przybysz

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)

[Francois Papon]

+1 (non-binding)

François


Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
>  +1 Approve the release
>  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[Christian Schneider]

I agree with Dominik. The version number should be 1.2.0 instead of 1.2.
Not sure if it makes a technical difference but a two part version number
is highly unusual.
What about the missing bundles ? If they did not change it is of course
fine to not release them.

Christian

2017-12-30 22:29 GMT+01:00 Dominik Przybysz :

> -1
>
> Jars are ok, but I would suggest to release the bundles to maven with
> versions *1.2.0*, not *1.2*. It would be more compatible to previous
> versioning scheme, e. g.
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core/1.1.0
>
> There were also two other bundles released previously and they are missing
> in this release:
> -
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/
> org.apache.aries.jmx
> -
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint
> Should it be like this?
>
> 2017-12-30 21:12 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert :
>
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 29 December 2017 at 22:28, David Bosschaert <
> david.bosscha...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
> > > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> inconsistent
> > > exceptions
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
> > > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > > exceptions
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > >  +1 Approve the release
> > >  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > David Bosschaert
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam / Regards,
> Dominik Przybysz
>



-- 
-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[Dominik Przybysz]

-1

Jars are ok, but I would suggest to release the bundles to maven with
versions *1.2.0*, not *1.2*. It would be more compatible to previous
versioning scheme, e. g.
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core/1.1.0

There were also two other bundles released previously and they are missing
in this release:
-
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/org.apache.aries.jmx
-
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries.jmx/org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint
Should it be like this?

2017-12-30 21:12 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert :

> Here's my +1
>
> David
>
> On 29 December 2017 at 22:28, David Bosschaert  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
> > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> > exceptions
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
> > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > exceptions
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> >  +1 Approve the release
> >  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Bosschaert
> >
>



-- 
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Dominik Przybysz

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[David Bosschaert]

Here's my +1

David

On 29 December 2017 at 22:28, David Bosschaert 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122
>
> Please vote:
>
>  +1 Approve the release
>  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[Raymond Auge]

+1 (non-binding)

On Dec 30, 2017 04:09, "Francois Papon" 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Francois
>
>
> Le 30/12/2017 à 02:28, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
> > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> > exceptions
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
> > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > exceptions
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> >  +1 Approve the release
> >  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Bosschaert
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[Francois Papon]

+1 (non-binding)

Francois


Le 30/12/2017 à 02:28, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122
>
> Please vote:
>
>  +1 Approve the release
>  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

On 29/12/2017 23:28, David Bosschaert wrote:

Hi,

I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components

org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
[ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
exceptions

org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
[ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
exceptions
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122

Please vote:

  +1 Approve the release
  -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Best regards,

David Bosschaert

[VOTE] Release Aries JMX components

[David Bosschaert]

Hi,

I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components

org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2
org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2
[ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
exceptions

org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2
[ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
exceptions
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present

Staging repositories (Nexus chose to split it into separate repos):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1120
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1121
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1122

Please vote:

 +1 Approve the release
 -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Best regards,

David Bosschaert