Have significant changes been made since January? If not, IP clearance may not
be required. The code as of January is still kosher Arrow IP, even if it’s been
deleted from git.
Julian
> On Jul 15, 2022, at 7:02 PM, Andy Grove wrote:
>
> datafusion-python was donated to the Apache Arrow proj
datafusion-python was donated to the Apache Arrow project in April 2021 and
was added to the arrow-datafusion repository [1].
datafusion-python was then removed from the repository in January 2022 [2]
and added to a new repository in the datafusion-contrib organization
outside of Arrow governance.
Yes - I followed up with James to get clarity on the exact wording used so I
can fill out the paperwork accurately and am just waiting on that.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, at 18:07, Ray Lum wrote:
> I believe the software grant has now been sent to secret...@apache.org.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:45
I believe the software grant has now been sent to secret...@apache.org.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:45 AM David Li wrote:
> The vote passes with 5 binding votes and 3 non-binding votes.
>
> Thanks all - I will update the form and all that should be left are the
> software grant and then the final v
Hi,
It seems that this is related to
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/12303 .
Should we backport this too?
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.1 - RC0" on Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:55:35
+0200,
Krisztián Szűcs wrote:
> +0
>
> I'm getting the same error with go version
The vote has passed with 5 +1 votes (4 binding). Thank you to all who helped
with the release verification.
We have published new versions of DataFusion to crates.io:
https://crates.io/crates/datafusion/10.0.0
https://crates.io/crates/datafusion-cli/10.0.0
https://crates.io/crates/datafusion-comm
Hi Kou,
Thank you for confirming the license compatibility!
We will continue to keep the community updated as development efforts progress
on libmexclass, and we prepare for integration with the upstream Arrow codebase.
Best Regards,
Kevin Gurney
From: Sutou K
+0
I'm getting the same error with go version 1.18.1 darwin/arm64 but it
works with go version 1.16.12.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:09 PM Jacob Wujciak
wrote:
>
> +0 I got the following repeatable error in arrow/array on manjaro 21.3.2.
> Full log at [1]
>
> └ Found go version go1.18.3 linux/amd6
+1 (binding)
verified on arm64 macOS
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:59 AM Jacob Wujciak
wrote:
>
> +1 (nb), verified on manjaro 21.3.2
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:38 AM Raul Cumplido Dominguez
> wrote:
>
> > +1, verified on ubuntu 22.04
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:59 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
>
+1 (binding)
verified on arm64 macOS
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:57 AM Jacob Wujciak
wrote:
>
> +1 (nb), verified on manjaro 21.3.2
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:36 AM Raul Cumplido Dominguez
> wrote:
>
> > +1, verified on Ubuntu 22.04
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:00 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
>
+0 I got the following repeatable error in arrow/array on manjaro 21.3.2.
Full log at [1]
└ Found go version go1.18.3 linux/amd64 at /usr/bin/go
/tmp/arrow-7.0.1.DuPzW/apache-arrow-7.0.1/go/arrow
/tmp/arrow-7.0.1.DuPzW/apache-arrow-7.0.1 ~/verify-rc/arrow
ok github.com/apache/arrow/go/v7/arrow 0.0
+1 (nb), verified on manjaro 21.3.2
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:38 AM Raul Cumplido Dominguez
wrote:
> +1, verified on ubuntu 22.04
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:59 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
>
> > +1, verified on arm64
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sutou Kouhei
> > Sent: Friday, July 1
+1 (nb), verified on manjaro 21.3.2
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:36 AM Raul Cumplido Dominguez
wrote:
> +1, verified on Ubuntu 22.04
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:00 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
>
> > +1, verified on arm64
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sutou Kouhei
> > Sent: Friday, July 15
+1, verified on ubuntu 22.04
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:59 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
> +1, verified on arm64
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sutou Kouhei
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 5:11 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 8.0.1 - RC0
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like t
+1, verified on ubuntu 22.04
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:59 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
> +1, verified on arm64
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sutou Kouhei
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 5:11 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.1 - RC0
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like t
+1, verified on Ubuntu 22.04
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:00 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
> +1, verified on arm64
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sutou Kouhei
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 5:11 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 6.0.2 - RC0
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like t
Hi everyone,
Yes the current code is a bit difficult to reason about due to the fact
that we rely on nodes marking their finished_ future as finished at the
proper times. The various ExecNodes were further inconsistent about when
they created their futures and where, and sometimes they'd overwrite
I ran into similar issues where a bug in a node's code led to an error that
caused difficult-to-debug hangs or crashes during execution. I think a common
problem with diagnosing such issues is that error messages (within Status
instances) during execution do not always get communicated. Perhaps
18 matches
Mail list logo
