Hi,
I requested review to JS developers.
Thanks,
--
kou
In <588ac3af-81ce-4414-9d10-5ad936fe4...@app.fastmail.com>
"Process to get arrow-JS bugfixes merged in?" on Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:38:44
-0800,
"Thomas Sarlandie" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I opened an issue a few weeks ago (in JIRA):
> https:
Hi,
I opened an issue a few weeks ago (in JIRA):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-18247
I also submitted a pull-request to fix the bug:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14587
What is the best way (this email?) to get one of the javascript maintainers
attention to look at it and
ASF Infra is running a survey and would like feedback from any committer.
Cross-posting here in case folks aren't on the infra mailing list. If you
have opinions you would like to share, please see the link below.
Neal
-- Forwarded message -
From: Chris Thistlethwaite
Date: Thu,
Hey James, thanks for putting this up.
Inline:
> The suggestion is to make this part of Flight as an
> optional feature, rather than Flight SQL due to its applicability outside
> of just database access.
Which uses do you see? I see statefulness as a general antipattern here, so I'm
wary of int
Hi,
I am sending this email earlier than usual to let everyone know about the
current plans for 11.0.0 ahead of New Year's possible festivities so
everyone can plan ahead and raise any possible concern around the planned
dates.
The plan is to start preparing the 11.0.0 release around mid January
Sorry for the late reply -- thank you James and David for this discussion.
I agree that adding Catalog support would be a valuable addition to Flight
SQL, and it recently came up as we begin to implement Flight SQL in
InfluxDB IOx [1].
> - A standard URI scheme for Flight SQL that can be used by
HOCON is a superset of JSON, so I'm not sure making it an extension type
based it on JSON would be a good idea.
Le 01/12/2022 à 06:23, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
Can a logical extension be based on another logical extension?
Potentially but this is mostly an implementation details, each t
