;> >
>> > in this case.
>> >
>> > Here is an use case I think:
>> >
>> > A system has time series data. Each node in the system has
>> > data for one day. If a client requests "SELECT * FROM data
>> > WHERE server = 'server
t;
> > Here is an use case I think:
> >
> > A system has time series data. Each node in the system has
> > data for one day. If a client requests "SELECT * FROM data
> > WHERE server = 'server1' ORDER BY created_at DESC", the
> > system returns the following
day. If a client requests "SELECT * FROM data
> WHERE server = 'server1' ORDER BY created_at DESC", the
> system returns the followings:
>
> Endpoint 20230428: (DATA_FOR_2023_04_28)
> Endpoint 20230427: (DATA_FOR_2023_04_27)
> Endpoint 20230426: (DATA_FOR_2023_04_26)
>
Resending with RESULT subject line
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> The vote passes with three binding +1 votes. Thanks, everyone.
>
> Source release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/arrow-datafusion-python-23.0.0/
>
> Wheels:
>
>
The vote passes with three binding +1 votes. Thanks, everyone.
Source release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/arrow-datafusion-python-23.0.0/
Wheels:
https://pypi.org/project/datafusion/
Thanks,
Andy.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:18 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1 (binding)
se case I think:
A system has time series data. Each node in the system has
data for one day. If a client requests "SELECT * FROM data
WHERE server = 'server1' ORDER BY created_at DESC", the
system returns the followings:
Endpoint 20230428: (DATA_FOR_2023_04_28)
Endpoint 20230427: (DATA
Hi,
Thanks for sharing the log.
libcrypto.so isn't related on the segmentation fault. It's
just for relating to showing backtrace.
> perl: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This is happen at
Hi,
Could you share the full log of the errors?
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 12.0.0 - RC0" on Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:31:55
-0700,
Will Jones wrote:
> Hi Raul,
>
> It might be worth creating a new RC that fixes more of the test issues,
> even if they shouldn't be
Hi,
I don't think https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321
is a blocker for 12.0.0 RC0 because our fix
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35324 just skips these
tests only for pandas 2.0.1.
If it's a blocker of verification, can we skip these tests
by adding some pytest arguments in our
So this would be a case where multiple "endpoints" are acting as a single
"stream of batches"? Or am I misunderstanding?
What're some scenarios where that would be done? When would it be
preferred for the client to merge the endpoints instead of the client's
user?
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 3:22 PM
The server would have to report these as multiple endpoints in all your
examples. (There's nothing saying a particular location can only appear once,
or that "Endpoint 2" has to come after "Endpoint 1" for the DESC example.)
The flag tells the client if it can fetch data in parallel without
I have uploaded the log [1] for the run using conda with gandiva active. It
looks like there is an issue with libcrypt.so causing these tests to
segfault.
1: https://gist.github.com/assignUser/cba0a13875de9d6a4f31000f585244f0
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Will Jones wrote:
> Hi Raul,
>
> It
Hi Raul,
It might be worth creating a new RC that fixes more of the test issues,
even if they shouldn't be blockers. I've run the release script a few
different times, and after 1.5 hours (is that a normal runtime for
verification?) I get various test failures. So far the errors are in the
Below is a summary of the notes from yesterday's meeting:
Attendees:
- Ian Cook
- Raúl Cumplido
- Xuwei Fu
- Will Jones
- Bryce Mecum
- Rok Mihevc
- Sri Nadukudy
- Matthew Topol
Discussion:
Arrow 12.0.0 release
- RC0 has been proposed [1]
- There were a lot of CI failures at the time of the
+1 (binding) x86_64 mac
Andrew
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:52 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:13 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Python
> > Bindings,
Hi,
The vote for the RC has been open for 5 days.
I will wait until tomorrow, if no more +1 votes are casted I
understand that the issue related to the pandas failures
(https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35321) is causing verification
to fail and we require a new RC with the above fix.
Let
I wonder if we have considered simply removing the statement "There is no
ordering defined on endpoints. Hence, if the returned data has an ordering,
it should be returned in a single endpoint." and replacing it with
something that says "the relative ordering of data from different endpoints
is
My apologies, I did not see the thread [1] for some reason
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r28rw5n39jwtvn08oljl09d4q2c1ysvb
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:32 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Felipe, thank you for bringing this up.
>
> Another approach that is sometimes used in database engines (like
Felipe, thank you for bringing this up.
Another approach that is sometimes used in database engines (like DuckDB)
and is often called selection vectors, is to store another bitmask that
says which elements in the array should be "selected" and which are ignored
and functions like a view.
For
Hi,
I tried this on a manjarolinux/base Docker image.
I think that this is a problem of the Arch Linux's llvm
package. LLVMExports.cmake in the package doesn't provide
the LLVMX86CodeGen target:
# grep add_library /usr/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMExports.cmake
add_library(LLVMDemangle STATIC IMPORTED)
Hi Jacob,
Could you share the log of the error to try and understand what is causing
the test failures?
El jue, 27 abr 2023, 0:29, Jacob Wujciak
escribió:
> I was able to build with USE_CONDA=1 but that produced a long list of test
> failures, which seems concerning?
> 17 -
Hi,
The vote carries with 6 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non-binding
vote and no -1 votes.
I'll merge https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35174 .
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20230424.103259.664806138128874521@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE] Formalize how to change format" on Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:32:59 +0900
22 matches
Mail list logo
