I don't even think there's even a wide view across the Java ecosystem
regarding JPMS. So far all usages of Apache Arrow I've seen do not require
JPMS, and amongst the sister projects I checked (Parquet, Iceberg), none of
them have added support for JPMS.
I don't know how many dependencies used by
g list.
>
> Do we think a vote is needed before officially moving forward with Java 8
> deprecation?
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 12:50 PM Laurent Goujon >
> wrote:
>
> > I also mentioned Apache Parquet and haven't seen someone mentioned
> if/when
> > Apache Parquet
I also mentioned Apache Parquet and haven't seen someone mentioned if/when
Apache Parquet would transition.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:07 AM Dane Pitkin wrote:
> Fokko, thank you for these datapoints! It's great to see how other low
> level Java OSS projects are approaching this.
>
> JB, I
need to find a way to extend the image or create a
new one. If people have other options in mind, I'm also all ear.
Laurent
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:07 AM Laurent Goujon wrote:
> I can give it a try for sure
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 10:26 AM Dane Pitkin
> wrote:
>
>> I
Arrow is used by a couple of projects like Apache Parquet and Apache
Iceberg which are still compiled with Java 8. Not a fully OSS project, but
Dremio is built with Java 11 and I don't see us migrating to Java 17 until
next year.
I'm still working on building Arrow with a more recent version of
decide on a major Arrow version upgrading the target language version.
> > That's what I meant by "consensus".
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:55 PM Laurent Goujon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > At code level we
some features
> from Java 17+ (I'm thinking about record, memory API, etc).
> I would be more than happy to help on this as soon as we have a consensus.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 7:48 PM Laurent Goujon
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Arrow Jav
Hello Arrow Java developers,
I would wonder if the community would be okay to change the minimum Java
version used by the build toolchain to at least Java 17 or 21 (or even 22).
This is different from changing the minimum Java version used at runtime
which would still be 8 (following the vote
s.html#clas
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 17:56, David Li wrote:
> > Yes, I can handle this process on the PMC side. Thanks for the help.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 16:55, Laurent Goujon wrote:
> >> David, would you be the PMC contact for the flightsql-odbc driver?
help. Please do let us know if there's anything we can do to help as
> well.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
> ________
> From: Laurent Goujon
> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Am I reading the ticket correctly that this is also about importing some of
the Dremio code into Arrow project (namely
https://github.com/dremio/flightsql-odbc/). If it is the case, let me check
how my company can provide the documentation for the project?
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 8:41 AM David Li
hu, Dec 7, 2023, at 17:14, Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
> > > The message types defined in FlightSql.proto are all marked
> experimental
> > as
> > > well. Would this include changes to any of those?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 16:43 Laurent Goujon &
we have been using it with Dremio for a while now, and we consider it stable
+1 (not binding)
Laurent
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol
wrote:
> +1, I agree with everyone else
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 7:49 PM James Duong
> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me. It's used in a good number of
Hi,
I made a small change to the Java Arrow library to support newer versions
of Jackson, as more projects use Jackson 2.12 or higher but Arrow still
uses Jackson 2.11.
Jira ticket link is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15192
Pull request link is
> > BufferAllocator root = new RootAllocator(
> > >
> > > BaseAllocator.configBuilder()
> > >
> > > .maxAllocation(MAX_ALLOCATION)
> > >
> > > .memoryChunkManagerFactory(MemoryChunkCleaner.newFactory())
> > //
&
t, or I can open a ticket asap?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hongze
>
>
>
>
> At 2021-10-05 13:39:55, "Laurent Goujon" wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I gave a quick look at your patches but to be honest, it's not easy to
> >figure out the problem y
Hi,
I gave a quick look at your patches but to be honest, it's not easy to
figure out the problem you're trying to solve in the first place. Or is it
simply to discard the use of ref counting to track buffer usages and
relying on Java references to keep track of buffers at the expense of
creating
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-9000:
-
Summary: Java build crashes with JDK14
Key: ARROW-9000
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9000
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Bug
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-3061:
-
Summary: headroom does not take into account reservation
Key: ARROW-3061
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3061
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue
Same here.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Siddharth Teotia
wrote:
> Hi Atul,
>
> I will take a look today.
>
> Thanks,
> Sidd
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Atul Dambalkar <
> atul.dambal...@xoriant.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sid, Laurent, Uwe,
> >
> > Any idea when can someone take a look
I really like Julian's idea of unwrapping Arrow objects out of the JDBC
ResultSet, but I wonder if the unwrap class has to be specific to the
driver and if an interface can be designed to be used by multiple drivers:
for drivers based on Arrow, it means you could totally skip the
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-1527:
-
Summary: Fix Travis JDK9 build
Key: ARROW-1527
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1527
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Bug
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-1355:
-
Summary: Make arrow buildable with java9
Key: ARROW-1355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1355
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-385:
Summary: Refactor metrics system
Key: ARROW-385
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-385
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Improvement
I just opened a pull request to make flatc optional + allow for a
user-provided flatc: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/129
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> wrote:
> I should rephrase: there's no flatc binary artifact published on maven
Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I wonder if that means we should check in the generated code so people on
> > those platforms can still build the java.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com>
Laurent Goujon created ARROW-208:
Summary: Add checkstyle policy to java project
Key: ARROW-208
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-208
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283609#comment-15283609
]
Laurent Goujon commented on ARROW-102:
--
pull request: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/63
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283603#comment-15283603
]
Laurent Goujon commented on ARROW-198:
--
isn't it ARROW-113?
> OutOfMemoryError for vector test c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283602#comment-15283602
]
Laurent Goujon commented on ARROW-113:
--
pull request: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/65
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15275428#comment-15275428
]
Laurent Goujon commented on ARROW-192:
--
The templates are under vector/src/main/codegen. Modify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15272961#comment-15272961
]
Laurent Goujon commented on ARROW-192:
--
The maven plugin which generates these classes is not run
32 matches
Mail list logo
