Re: [Format] Redundant information in Time type?

2019-03-01 Thread Wes McKinney
As I recall there might have been the desire to permit 64-bit representation of SECOND and MILLI time values, but I would opt for YAGNI (until we actually do) and deprecate this bit width field in Schema.fbs (we shouldn't outright remove it -- for backwards compatibility -- unless it's actively

[Format] Redundant information in Time type?

2019-02-27 Thread Micah Kornfield
In the flatbuffer schema what is the purpose of bit width in "table Time" [1] based on the documentation it sounds like bit-width is fully determined by TimeUnit? In other cases (e.g. Date) we don't have a similar field. Thanks, Micah [1]