The vote carries with 3 binding +1 and 2 non-binding +1
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:05 AM Brian Bowman wrote:
>
> Can non-Arrow PMC members/committers vote?
>
> If so, +1
>
> -Brian
>
> On 4/25/19, 4:34 PM, "Wes McKinney" wrote:
>
> EXTERNAL
>
> In a recent mailing list discussion [1]
Can non-Arrow PMC members/committers vote?
If so, +1
-Brian
On 4/25/19, 4:34 PM, "Wes McKinney" wrote:
EXTERNAL
In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
Arrow columnar format
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:58 PM Philipp Moritz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:33 PM Wes McKinney
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:33 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
> > to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
> > Arrow
+1 (binding)
Regards
Antoine.
Le 25/04/2019 à 22:33, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
> to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
> Arrow columnar format with 64-bit signed integer offsets, to be used
> in
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:33 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
> to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
> Arrow columnar format with 64-bit signed integer offsets, to be used
> in addition to
In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
Arrow columnar format with 64-bit signed integer offsets, to be used
in addition to the existing 32-bit offset varieties. These will be
implemented as new types in
