Hello,
The vote succeeds with 3 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding).
I'll soon open a JIRA for the specification and the C++ implementation,
so that we can merge those timely.
Regards
Antoine.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:06:33 +0100
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing
A week has passed, I would say we should move forward with merging
patches related to this. Any last words (in the next 12 hours or so)?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:48 AM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:47 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> >
> > There has also
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:47 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> There has also been interest from DuckDB:
> https://github.com/cwida/duckdb/issues/151
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:37:43 -0600
> Wes McKinney wrote:
> > As I recall TFX developers weighed in that
There has also been interest from DuckDB:
https://github.com/cwida/duckdb/issues/151
Regards
Antoine.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:37:43 -0600
Wes McKinney wrote:
> As I recall TFX developers weighed in that this would be helpful for
> TensorFlow-related use cases where they are concerns about
As I recall TFX developers weighed in that this would be helpful for
TensorFlow-related use cases where they are concerns about C++ ABI
compatibility. Since this project has been ongoing for about 5 months
(see also related discussion around implementation guidelines for
third parties [1]) there
I reviewed the spec again (not the implementation). I'm +1 on this.
I was wondering if we shared/received feedback on this with any other
communities?
Thanks,
Micah
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:13 PM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> I will try to review tomorrow and cast a vote.
>
> On Fri, Feb 14,
I will try to review tomorrow and cast a vote.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:41 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> There is only 1 binding +1 vote so far, we should probably wait for
> three before closing the vote (it's possible that lazy consensus could
> be employed here but not much harm in waiting a few
There is only 1 binding +1 vote so far, we should probably wait for
three before closing the vote (it's possible that lazy consensus could
be employed here but not much harm in waiting a few more days)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:15 PM Francois Saint-Jacques
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020
+1
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:08 PM Fan Liya wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:52 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:29 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ah, you're right, it's PR 6040:
> > >
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:52 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:29 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ah, you're right, it's PR 6040:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6040
> >
> > Similarly, the C++ implementation is at PR 6026:
> >
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:29 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Ah, you're right, it's PR 6040:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6040
>
> Similarly, the C++ implementation is at PR 6026:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6026
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 11/02/2020 à
Ah, you're right, it's PR 6040:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6040
Similarly, the C++ implementation is at PR 6026:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6026
Regards
Antoine.
Le 11/02/2020 à 23:17, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> hi Antoine, PR 5442 seems to no longer be the right one.
hi Antoine, PR 5442 seems to no longer be the right one. Which open PR
contains the specification now?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 1:06 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing the creation of a minimalist C-based data
> interface for applications to exchange Arrow columnar
Hello,
We have been discussing the creation of a minimalist C-based data
interface for applications to exchange Arrow columnar data structures
with each other. Some notable features of this interface include:
* A small amount of header-only C code can be copied independently into
third-party
Right, I'll give it a try in a few days.
Best regards
Antoine.
Le 09/12/2019 à 12:46, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> While it's unfortunate to have to re-examine some basic design issues
> at this stage, I agree with Jacques's point that it would be nice if
> we can accommodate (without great
While it's unfortunate to have to re-examine some basic design issues
at this stage, I agree with Jacques's point that it would be nice if
we can accommodate (without great hardship) the use case where a
stream/pipeline of record batches are passed in C that does not
require the called function to
+1, as this is useful IMO.
Best,
Liya Fan
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> I'm voting -1 on this. I posted the thinking why on the PR. The high-level
> is that I think it needs to better address the pipelined use case as right
> now it fails to support
-1 (binding)
I'm voting -1 on this. I posted the thinking why on the PR. The high-level
is that I think it needs to better address the pipelined use case as right
now it fails to support that at all and has too much weight to ignore that
use case.
I actually would have posted it here but totally
Hello,
Could more PMC members take a look at this work?
Thank you
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:50 PM Neal Richardson
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:56 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:54 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> > >
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:56 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:54 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > We have been discussing the creation of a minimalist C-based data
> > interface for applications to exchange Arrow columnar data
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:54 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> We have been discussing the creation of a minimalist C-based data
> interface for applications to exchange Arrow columnar data structures
> with each other. Some notable features of this interface include:
>
> * A
hello,
We have been discussing the creation of a minimalist C-based data
interface for applications to exchange Arrow columnar data structures
with each other. Some notable features of this interface include:
* A small amount of header-only C code can be copied into downstream
applications, no
22 matches
Mail list logo
