[RESULT] [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-07-02 Thread Wes McKinney
The vote carries with 6 binding +1 and 1 non-binding +1. Thanks all On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:07 AM Francois Saint-Jacques wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:55 AM Neal Richardson > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:52 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-30 Thread Francois Saint-Jacques
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:55 AM Neal Richardson wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:52 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Le 29/06/2020 à 23:59, Wes McKinney a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been pro

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-30 Thread Neal Richardson
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:52 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Le 29/06/2020 à 23:59, Wes McKinney a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow > > the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technically > > p

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-30 Thread Antoine Pitrou
+1 (binding) Le 29/06/2020 à 23:59, Wes McKinney a écrit : > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow > the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technically > possible in our metadata serialization, but not allowed according to > the language o

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-30 Thread Uwe L. Korn
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 6:24 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:11 PM Ben Kietzman > wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, 18:00 Wes McKinney wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has b

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-29 Thread Wes McKinney
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:11 PM Ben Kietzman wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, 18:00 Wes McKinney wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow > > the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technicall

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-29 Thread Ben Kietzman
+1 (non binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, 18:00 Wes McKinney wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow > the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technically > possible in our metadata serialization, but not allowed according to > the langu

Re: [VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-29 Thread Micah Kornfield
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:00 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow > the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technically > possible in our metadata serialization, but not allowed according to > the langu

[VOTE] Permitting unsigned integers for Arrow dictionary indices

2020-06-29 Thread Wes McKinney
Hi, As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to allow the use of unsigned dictionary indices (which is already technically possible in our metadata serialization, but not allowed according to the language of the columnar specification), with the following caveats: * Unless part