The vote carries with 6 binding +1 votes, 1 non-binding +1 vote, and no
-1/0 votes.
Thanks everyone for participating! We'll get that PR merged.
--Matt
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 12:59 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jacob Quinn
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jacob Quinn wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Jacob
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:16 AM Matt Topol
> wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
> > Format Spec of adding "+r" as the
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
-Jacob
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:16 AM Matt Topol
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
> Format Spec of adding "+r" as the format string for passing Run-End Encoded
> arrays through the Arrow C Data Interface.
>
+1 (binding)
On 16/08/2023 16:58, Matt Topol wrote:
It would be nice to get approval from authors of other implementations
such as Rust, C#, Javascript...
I'm hoping that some of them see this and participate in the vote. *crosses
fingers*
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:10 AM Antoine Pitrou wrot
> It would be nice to get approval from authors of other implementations
such as Rust, C#, Javascript...
I'm hoping that some of them see this and participate in the vote. *crosses
fingers*
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:10 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> +1 from me (binding).
>
> It would be nice to
+1 from me (binding).
It would be nice to get approval from authors of other implementations
such as Rust, C#, Javascript...
Thanks for doing this!
Le 16/08/2023 à 16:16, Matt Topol a écrit :
Hey All,
As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
Format Spec
+1
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, at 10:21, Dewey Dunnington wrote:
> +1! Looking forward to implementing this in nanoarrow!
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:18 AM Ian Cook wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16 AM Matt Topol
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey All,
>> >
>> > As proposed by
+1! Looking forward to implementing this in nanoarrow!
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:18 AM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16 AM Matt Topol
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
> > Format Sp
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16 AM Matt Topol
wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
> Format Spec of adding "+r" as the format string for passing Run-End Encoded
> arrays through the Arrow C Data Interface.
>
> A PR cont
Hey All,
As proposed by Felipe [1] I'm starting a vote on the proposed update to the
Format Spec of adding "+r" as the format string for passing Run-End Encoded
arrays through the Arrow C Data Interface.
A PR containing an update to the C++ Arrow implementation to add support
for this format stri
10 matches
Mail list logo
