A lot of good info here, I added a point that has come up often for me.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:03 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> I read through and left some comments.
>
> Would be great to turn into an FAQ section in the docs and add a link
> to the navigation on the front page of the website.
>
I read through and left some comments.
Would be great to turn into an FAQ section in the docs and add a link
to the navigation on the front page of the website.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:22 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
>
> Thanks to the all contributions that already came in. I made some more
>
Thanks to the all contributions that already came in. I made some more
additions and hope to turn this into a PR to the site soon.
Uwe
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, as well. I added comments and additions on
> the document.
>
> On
I think this is a good idea, as well. I added comments and additions on
the document.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Richardson <
neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Uwe, I think this is an excellent idea. I've started
>
>
Uwe, I think this is an excellent idea. I've started
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cgN7mYzH30URDTaioHsCP2d80wKKHDNs9f5s7vdb2mA/edit?usp=sharing
to collect some ideas and notes. Once we have gathered our thoughts
there, we can put them in the appropriate places.
I think that some of the
Hello,
there has been a lot of public discussions lately with some mentions of
actually informed, valid critique of things in the Arrow project. From my
perspective, these things include "there is not STL-native C++ Arrow API", "the
base build requires too much dependencies", "the pyarrow
