+1
- Verified hashes
- Built from source without an issue
- Ran a sample cluster
- Tried a few sections of the AsterixDB 101 Primer
Best,
Taewoo
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 7:16 PM Wail Alkowaileet wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified:
> - Hashes
> - Signatures
> - Build from source
> - Ran a
+1 (non-binding)
Verified:
- Hashes
- Signatures
- Build from source
- Ran a sample cluster:
Ingest and query a "sensors" records
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 6:14 PM Till Westmann wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts:
> - Signatures and hashes correct
> — LICENSE
+1
Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts:
- Signatures and hashes correct
— LICENSE and NOTICE look ok
- Source files have Apache header
- No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files)
- Can compile from source
Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact:
-
The log4j-1.2-api is still at an older version (2.13.1), given that our
tests are passing there likely isn't any compatibility
issue, but if we end up respinning for some other reason, we might want to
consider advancing log4j-1.2-api to 2.15.0.
Verified:
- source builds
- signatures
-
Hi everyone,
Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB. This
release is purely a maintenance release to 0.9.7 and contains minimal
changes.
The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit:
https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/14504
The release artifacts
