Re: What's the best way to execute only a single test in ExecutionTest

2016-10-13 Thread abdullah alamoudi
I added it to cleanup between tests since frequently, adding a new test case 
becomes a considerable amount of work to cleanup leftovers from previous tests.
In addition, it prints out a list of tests that have left some data at the end 
of running all the test cases.

Cheers,
Abdullah.


> On Oct 13, 2016, at 4:28 PM, Till Westmann  wrote:
> 
> Who knows what "get daversename" does and why we need to run it anyway?
> 
> Cheers,
> Till
> 
> On 13 Oct 2016, at 14:14, Taewoo Kim wrote:
> 
>> In the past, usually I modified executeTest() of TestExecutor class to
>> bypass another test cases by checking cUnit.getName() method and execute
>> only one test case. However, nowadays, even if I apply this logic, still
>> some parts ("get daversename") for each test (1,300) are executed anyway.
>> 
>> Does anyone know how I can execute only a single test in ExecutionTest?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Taewoo



Re: What's the best way to execute only a single test in ExecutionTest

2016-10-13 Thread Till Westmann
Who knows what "get daversename" does and why we need to run it anyway?

Cheers,
Till

On 13 Oct 2016, at 14:14, Taewoo Kim wrote:

> In the past, usually I modified executeTest() of TestExecutor class to
> bypass another test cases by checking cUnit.getName() method and execute
> only one test case. However, nowadays, even if I apply this logic, still
> some parts ("get daversename") for each test (1,300) are executed anyway.
>
> Does anyone know how I can execute only a single test in ExecutionTest?
>
> Best,
> Taewoo


Re: What's the best way to execute only a single test in ExecutionTest

2016-10-13 Thread Chris Hillery
mvn verify -Dtest=ExecutionTest -Dtestre=foo

will only run tests that match the regular expression "foo".

Ceej
aka Chris Hillery



On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Yingyi Bu  wrote:

> Put the test into only.xml or only_sqlpp.xml?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Taewoo Kim  wrote:
>
> > In the past, usually I modified executeTest() of TestExecutor class to
> > bypass another test cases by checking cUnit.getName() method and execute
> > only one test case. However, nowadays, even if I apply this logic, still
> > some parts ("get daversename") for each test (1,300) are executed anyway.
> >
> > Does anyone know how I can execute only a single test in ExecutionTest?
> >
> > Best,
> > Taewoo
> >
>


Re: What's the best way to execute only a single test in ExecutionTest

2016-10-13 Thread Yingyi Bu
Put the test into only.xml or only_sqlpp.xml?


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Taewoo Kim  wrote:

> In the past, usually I modified executeTest() of TestExecutor class to
> bypass another test cases by checking cUnit.getName() method and execute
> only one test case. However, nowadays, even if I apply this logic, still
> some parts ("get daversename") for each test (1,300) are executed anyway.
>
> Does anyone know how I can execute only a single test in ExecutionTest?
>
> Best,
> Taewoo
>