Hi Ian,
I remembered I introduced this rate limiter before :)
For 1 and 2, the original thought was that log writes will be much less
compared with LSM writes (consider every record is written to log once but
will be flushed once and merged multiple times). By bounding flush/merge
rate, it will
I've been meaning to reply to this - it's time! I suspect that #1 is
just historical, and happened because the limiter's initial focus was on
keeping LSM activity (in particular big merges) from overrunning the
other activities in the system. It seems like this is the right move,
IMO. I
Hi everyone,
I've been working on a patch that adds read rate limiting to AsterixDB so
that multiple NCs can share the same disk in a more cooperative fashion.
Clearly since we already have write rate limiting, I looked at how that is
done as a first step. It seemed easy enough to perform the read
