The vote passes with 3 binding +1s and no 0's or -1's.
Vote thread permalink:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv53x55y6mgyzjmzwozc9m8g4skz48rm
On May 5, 2023 at 20:51:45, Taewoo Kim wrote:
> +1
>
> - checked hash
> - compiled source code
> - executed the sample cluster in binary and did a
+1
Cheers,
Murtadha
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 6:53 AM Taewoo Kim wrote:
> +1
>
> - checked hash
> - compiled source code
> - executed the sample cluster in binary and did a smoke test
>
> Best,
> Taewoo
>
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:44 PM Till Westmann
> wrote:
>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Checked the
+1
- checked hash
- compiled source code
- executed the sample cluster in binary and did a smoke test
Best,
Taewoo
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:44 PM Till Westmann wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts:
> - Signatures and hashes correct
> — LICENSE and NOTICE look
+1
Checked the Hyracks and AsterixDB source artifacts:
- Signatures and hashes correct
— LICENSE and NOTICE look ok
- Source files have Apache header
- No unexpected binary files (checked expected binary files)
- Can compile from source
Checked the AsterixDB Server binary artifact:
-
+1 to release.
Tested the AsterixDB NCService Installer path.
Downloaded the bits, started the engine, loaded up some Don C. test data
(schemaless), created some tabular views, and queries both the
collections and the views. Worked like a charm. (And gave me cool
warnings when I asked for
Hi everyone,
Please verify and vote on the latest release of Apache AsterixDB.
The change that produced this release is up on Gerrit:
https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/17502
The release artifacts are as follows:
AsterixDB Source
