[jira] [Resolved] (ATLAS-3086) Regression : Atlas Hive Hook doesn't capture insert into table values() queries

2019-09-12 Thread Madhan Neethiraj (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Madhan Neethiraj resolved ATLAS-3086.
-
Resolution: Fixed

> Regression : Atlas Hive Hook doesn't capture insert into table values() 
> queries
> ---
>
> Key: ATLAS-3086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3086
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: atlas-intg
>Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>Reporter: Sharmadha Sainath
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: trunk
>
>
> Atlas Hive Hook doesn't capture the query "insert into table values()" . This 
> is a regression as this event was captured in 0.8
> Other queries like 
> "from table1 a insert overwrite table bkp_table select a.id",
> "insert into tableB select c1,c2 from tableA" , information is captured and 
> lineage is created in 1.0



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-3396) ZipSource: Usage of In-memory Maps Limits the Size of Imports Performed

2019-09-12 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928885#comment-16928885
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ATLAS-3396:


Commit e6b9e9ad25b3b0538c0f864ab534cd16e9dd91b9 in atlas's branch 
refs/heads/master from Ashutosh Mestry
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=atlas.git;h=e6b9e9a ]

ATLAS-3396: ZipSourceWithBackingStore implementation. Empty ZIP unit test fix.


> ZipSource: Usage of In-memory Maps Limits the Size of Imports Performed
> ---
>
> Key: ATLAS-3396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3396
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components:  atlas-core
>Affects Versions: 0.8.4
>Reporter: Ashutosh Mestry
>Assignee: Ashutosh Mestry
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.8.4, trunk
>
> Attachments: 
> ATLAS-3396-ZipSource-Memory-usage-improvement-for-la-branch-0.8.patch, 
> ATLAS-3396-ZipSourceWithBackingDirectory-Implementat-master.patch
>
>
> *Background*
> _ZipSource_ is the container for working with Atlas-exported ZIP files. The 
> current implementation fetches the contents of the entire ZIP file in memory. 
> This greatly limits the size of ZIP files that can be imported.
> *Solution Guidance*
> New class _ZipSourceWIthBackingDirectory_, this will use a user-specified (or 
> default) temporary directory to preserve the contents of the ZIP file. This 
> will reduce the memory burden and large ZIP files can be imported.
> Minor refactoring to _ImportService_ will be necessary to support the new 
> variation of _EntityImportStream._
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


Re: [DRAFT] Board report for Apache Atlas: September 2019

2019-09-12 Thread Madhan Neethiraj
Nixon - thanks for reviewing the report and the suggestion. I will update the 
report to include keycloak authentication support.

Thanks,
Madhan



On 9/12/19, 2:40 AM, "Nixon Rodrigues"  
wrote:

Thanks Madhan for putting this together.

Can you review and add ( ATLAS-3153 :- Add Keycloak authentication method
to Atlas.)

Looks good to me, +1 for the draft.

Regards,
Nixon


On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:48 AM Madhan Neethiraj  wrote:

> Atlas team,
>
> Please review the draft board report below and send your 
feedback/comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Madhan
>
>
> ## Description:
>   Apache Atlas is a scalable and extensible set of core foundational
>   governance services that enables enterprises to effectively and
> efficiently
>   meet their compliance requirements within Hadoop and allows integration
> with
>   the complete enterprise data ecosystem
>
> ## Issues:
>   There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
>
> ## Activity:
>   - released 0.8.4 maintenance version
>   - added quick-search functionality, for a simpler search interface
>   - enhanced notification processing to handle multiple Kafka topics
>   - updated hook and bridges to replace object-type attributes with
> relationships
>   - added support for dynamic attributes, whose value is derived from
> value of other attribute(s)
>   - enhancements to handle references to non-existing entities during
> notification processing
>   - performance improvements in import/export functionality
>   - working on upgrading JanusGraph version to the most recent release,
> 0.4.0
>
> ## Health report:
>   - 3 new contributors added in last 3 months: Bolke, Sameer, SJQ
>
> ## PMC changes:
>   - Currently 34 PMC members
>   - Last addition to PMC role was on 5/13/2019
>
> ## Committer base changes:
>   - Currently 38 committers
>   - No new committers added in last 3 months
>   - Last addition to committer role was on 10/15/2018
>
> ## Releases:
>   0.8.4was released on 06/21/2019
>   1.2.0was released on 06/12/2019
>   2.0.0was released on 05/14/2019
>   0.8.3was released on 10/31/2018
>   1.1.0was released on 09/17/2018
>   1.0.0was released on 06/02/2018
>   0.8.2was released on 02/05/2018
>   1.0.0-alpha  was released on 01/25/2018
>   0.8.1was released on 08/29/2017
>   0.8-incubating   was released on 03/16/2017
>   0.7.1-incubating was released on 01/26/2017
>   0.7-incubating   was released on 07/09/2016
>   0.6-incubating   was released on 12/31/2015
>   0.5-incubating   was released on 07/11/2015
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





Fwd: Outstanding review requests (patches!)

2019-09-12 Thread Bolke de Bruin
Ping!

I wonder what to do to grab some attention, because I see there is even
some duplication of effort going on now - ATLAS-3399 is partially
duplicated ATLAS-3378 which did receive reviews quickly? Do I need to add
reviewers? I do think the added functionality is worthwhile and will
benefit others too, but please let me know if those patches don’t make
sense.

Thanks for responding.

Bolke

On 4 September 2019 at 14:47:41, Bolke de Bruin (bdbr...@gmail.com) wrote:

Hello Team!

I have some outstanding review requests and I would appreciate feedback or
(duh) merging. Can someone take a look:

* Add order by (sort) to basic search : https://reviews.apache.org/r/71431/
* Use fulltext indices for dsl search :
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71344/ (Received
one “ship it!”, no further action)
* Expose total count of index searches : https://reviews.apache.org/r/71282/
* Set log level to warn for relationships without relationship definition :
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71278/. (This one is under review)

Thanks!
Bolke


[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-3409) Remove the duplicate code in Solr6Index.

2019-09-12 Thread Bolke de Bruin (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928633#comment-16928633
 ] 

Bolke de Bruin commented on ATLAS-3409:
---

This is a duplicate of atlas-3397

> Remove the duplicate code in Solr6Index.
> 
>
> Key: ATLAS-3409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3409
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Sridhar
>Assignee: Sridhar
>Priority: Major
>
> Historically, we made a copy of SolrIndex from Janus graph and referred to it 
> as Solr6Index. Over time, SolrIndex in janus graph has mode enough progress 
> w.r.t Kerberos support etc. So, we should remove the duplicate code 
> Solr6Index.
> This ticket should be done after ATLAS-3378 is completed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Assigned] (ATLAS-3403) Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.

2019-09-12 Thread Keval Bhatt (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keval Bhatt reassigned ATLAS-3403:
--

Assignee: (was: Keval Bhatt)

> Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.
> -
>
> Key: ATLAS-3403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Rahul Kurup
>Priority: Minor
>
> Let us consider that a classification and a term has been assigned to an 
> entity. 
> If that entity is deleted, and then when the "Show Historical Entities" 
> filter is enabled on the search results page for that entity, the 
> classification is displayed but not the term.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Assigned] (ATLAS-3403) Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.

2019-09-12 Thread Keval Bhatt (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keval Bhatt reassigned ATLAS-3403:
--

Assignee: Keval Bhatt

> Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.
> -
>
> Key: ATLAS-3403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Rahul Kurup
>Assignee: Keval Bhatt
>Priority: Minor
>
> Let us consider that a classification and a term has been assigned to an 
> entity. 
> If that entity is deleted, and then when the "Show Historical Entities" 
> filter is enabled on the search results page for that entity, the 
> classification is displayed but not the term.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Updated] (ATLAS-3403) Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.

2019-09-12 Thread Keval Bhatt (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keval Bhatt updated ATLAS-3403:
---
Summary: Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search 
results page.  (was: UI: Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in 
Search results page.)

> Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Search results page.
> -
>
> Key: ATLAS-3403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3403
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Rahul Kurup
>Assignee: Keval Bhatt
>Priority: Minor
>
> Let us consider that a classification and a term has been assigned to an 
> entity. 
> If that entity is deleted, and then when the "Show Historical Entities" 
> filter is enabled on the search results page for that entity, the 
> classification is displayed but not the term.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Assigned] (ATLAS-3410) Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Details page.

2019-09-12 Thread Keval Bhatt (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keval Bhatt reassigned ATLAS-3410:
--

Assignee: Keval Bhatt

> Term assigned to historical entity is not visible in Details page.
> --
>
> Key: ATLAS-3410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3410
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Rahul Kurup
>Assignee: Keval Bhatt
>Priority: Minor
>
> This issue is related to an earlier one (ATLAS-3403). When a entity with a 
> term associated to it is deleted, and if you navigate to the Details page for 
> that entity, the classification is displayed but not the term.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-3411) Relationships : Having multiple relationships on the same attribute

2019-09-12 Thread Mandar Ambawane (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928399#comment-16928399
 ] 

Mandar Ambawane commented on ATLAS-3411:


1.Created 2 association relationships between 2 types using the same attribute 
"rel_attribute".
2.Created entities with the first relationship . Relationship is created 
successfully.
3. In the entitydef of entity1 , "rel_attribute" is not found in both 
relatedAttributes / attributes. But in entitydef of entity2 "rel_attribute" is 
found which contains entity1 information.

This happens only when multiple relations are created on the same attribute.

Repro steps (Attached the payloads) :

1. Create types by posting multi_entity_types.json (to create entity types) and 
multi_relationships.json (to create relationship typedefs) to v2/types/typedefs

2. Create entities by POSTing multi_entities.json to /v2/entity/bulk

3.Create relationship between the entities by POSTing the 
multi_relationship_instance.json to /v2/relationship (entity guids to be 
modified)

In entity1's entitydef, it can be seen that "rel_attirbute" is not present at 
all though the relationship guid is defined between entity1 and entity2.

> Relationships : Having multiple relationships on the same attribute
> ---
>
> Key: ATLAS-3411
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3411
> Project: Atlas
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Mandar Ambawane
>Assignee: Mandar Ambawane
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Created] (ATLAS-3411) Relationships : Having multiple relationships on the same attribute

2019-09-12 Thread Mandar Ambawane (Jira)
Mandar Ambawane created ATLAS-3411:
--

 Summary: Relationships : Having multiple relationships on the same 
attribute
 Key: ATLAS-3411
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3411
 Project: Atlas
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mandar Ambawane
Assignee: Mandar Ambawane






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)