org>
To: "dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org" <dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org>,
Shwetha Shivalingamurthy <sshivalingamur...@hortonworks.com>
Date: 20/12/2016 02:49
Subject: Re: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented
as entities
Sent by:
>From: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 11:27 PM
>To: dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented as
>entities
>
>Hi,
>I have raised Atlas Jiras 1254 an
Shivalingamurthy <sshivalingamur...@hortonworks.com>
To: "dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org" <dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 13/12/2016 04:43
Subject: Re: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented
as entities
Modeling terms as traits also e
12/2016 02:21
Subject: Re: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented
as entities
David,
I hope folks who are more plugged into Atlas on a day-to-day basis will
provide relevant feedback. I have a very few comments below.
Regarding point 10: AFAIK, the most significant c
th
>
>From: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 11:27 PM
>To: dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented as
>entities
>
>Hi,
>I have raised
From: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 11:27 PM
To: dev@atlas.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Improvement suggestion: change terms to be implemented as entities
Hi,
I have raised Atlas Jiras 1254 an 1245. I would lik
Hi,
I have raised Atlas Jiras 1254 an 1245. I would like your feedback on
changing the implementation of business/glossary terms to be entities,
rather than trait types and trait instances. This would mean:
1) A Term would have a guid for ATLAS-1245
2) TermResourceDefinition could be changed
