Build failed in Jenkins: aurora-packaging-nightly #1030

See -- [...truncated 81.04 MB...] fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git 01:32:49 00:00 [main] (To run a reporting server: ./pants

Re: [VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:11 PM, David McLaughlin wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jordan Ly wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Renan DelValle > wrote: > > > Kicking the vote off with a +1 from me since I feel it will simplify > our > > > patch

Re: [VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jordan Ly wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Renan DelValle wrote: > > Kicking the vote off with a +1 from me since I feel it will simplify our > > patch submission process and lower the difficulty bar for new > contributors. > > > > On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Renan DelValle wrote: > Kicking the vote off with a +1 from me since I feel it will simplify our > patch submission process and lower the difficulty bar for new contributors. > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM Renan DelValle wrote: > >> All, >> >> I

Re: [VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

Kicking the vote off with a +1 from me since I feel it will simplify our patch submission process and lower the difficulty bar for new contributors. On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > > I propose we move our project into the GitBox service. This will allow us > to

Re: [VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:15 AM Renan DelValle wrote: > All, > > I propose we move our project into the GitBox service. This will allow us > to read and write to our repositories on the GitHub platform enabling us to > accept pull requests for both the aurora and aurora-packaging

[VOTE] Move project to Apache GitBox service

All, I propose we move our project into the GitBox service. This will allow us to read and write to our repositories on the GitHub platform enabling us to accept pull requests for both the aurora and aurora-packaging repositories. If this vote passes, the pull request workflow will replace our

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project to GitBox service

Looks like we're all pretty much on board with this idea. This thread was made with the intention to see if anyone opposed the idea so I'll call the actual vote now. Sorry for the confusion! On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:38 AM Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:37

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project to GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:37 AM Mauricio Garavaglia < mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:01 AM, David McLaughlin > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks for kicking off the vote! > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle > wrote: > > > > > All, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project to GitBox service

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:01 AM, David McLaughlin wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for kicking off the vote! > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle wrote: > > > All, > > > > I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our current > > ReviewBoard based workflow to a GitHub