Looks like we're all pretty much on board with this idea. This thread was
made with the intention to see if anyone opposed the idea so I'll call the
actual vote now. Sorry for the confusion!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:38 AM Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:37
+1
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:37 AM Mauricio Garavaglia <
mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:01 AM, David McLaughlin
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for kicking off the vote!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
>
+1
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:01 AM, David McLaughlin
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for kicking off the vote!
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our current
> > ReviewBoard based workflow to a GitHub
+1
Thanks for kicking off the vote!
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle wrote:
> All,
>
> I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our current
> ReviewBoard based workflow to a GitHub pull request based workflow through
> the use of the ASF's GitBox service[1].
>
+1
2018년 6월 12일 (화) 09:59, Bill Farner 님이 작성:
> +1 for taking PRs, but I’m not opinionated about how that is achieved.
>
> > On Jun 11, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our current
> > ReviewBoard based
All,
I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our current
ReviewBoard based workflow to a GitHub pull request based workflow through
the use of the ASF's GitBox service[1].
The GitBox service would allow us to read/write to our GitHub repository
instead of only mirroring our
