Circling back to close this vote in the - I think - appropriate way.
This vote has failed. Vote summary:
+1 votes: 3 binding
+0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 1 binding
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
> Changing my vote to -1. We just found a critical bug with Maxim's commit:
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/commit/fee5943a95c4f08e148dc5f1366486a8c23d5773
> .
> This version is not suitable for release (or deploy for
+1, tested with verify-release-candidate
-Jake
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:21 AM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
> Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
>
> Aurora 0.12.0-rc0 includes the following:
> ---
> The
(moved off private list)
+1 (binding)
Successfully verified using
./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.12.0-rc0
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 PM, John Sirois wrote:
> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
> Apache
All,
I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release.
Aurora 0.12.0-rc0 includes the following:
---
The NEWS for the release is available at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git=NEWS=rel/0.12.0-rc0
The CHANGELOG for the