nder heavy load.
Thx
From: John Sirois
To: dev@aurora.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: A mini postmortem on snapshot failures
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
> Hi Zameer,
>
&
Is there a ticket for this? In our large test cluster, we hit into this under
heavy load.
Thx
From: John Sirois
To: dev@aurora.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: A mini postmortem on snapshot failures
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Joshua Cohen
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Joshua Cohen wrote:
> Hi Zameer,
>
> Thanks for this writeup!
>
> I think one other option to consider would be using a connection for
> writing the snapshots that's not bound by the pool's maximum checkout time.
> I'm not sure if this is feasible or not, but I wo
Thanks for the pointers regarding the broken documentation. I will fix that.
The configuration options have moved and are now described here
http://aurora.apache.org/documentation/latest/operations/configuration/#replicated-log-configuration
On 03/10/16 09:05, "meghdoot bhattacharya" wrote:
An immediate failover seems rather drastic too me. However, I have no anecdotal
evidence to back up this feeling or any other default config changes. Maybe
Joshua can share what they are using so that we can adjust the default values
accordingly?
Other thoughts:
• Have you tried this magic tric
Hi Zameer,
Thanks for this writeup!
I think one other option to consider would be using a connection for
writing the snapshots that's not bound by the pool's maximum checkout time.
I'm not sure if this is feasible or not, but I worry that there's
potentially no upper bound on raising the maximum
Zameer, thanks for sharing this. For folks who are looking to operate Aurora
with HA this is very valuable. Operational insights from aurora experts is
always welcome.Not to hijack the conversation on the 3 questions you asked, I
found inhttp://aurora.apache.org/documentation/latest/operations/s
