Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 RC0

2015-05-05 Thread Kevin Sweeney
overall +0 - I'm okay with proceeding with the changelog as the only
deficiency

+1 java tests pass
+1 python test pass
+1 e2e tests pass
+0 changelog is incorrect as wfarner notes



On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:

 -1 overall

 +1 checksums and signatures are good
 +1 unit tests and end-to-end tests pass
 -1 changelog contains tickets that were closed as won't fix.  i came up
 with a JIRA query [1] that seems to identify a bunch of these

 [1]

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AURORA%20AND%20fixVersion%3D0.8.0%20and%20resolution!%3Dfixed



 -=Bill

 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:

  All,
  I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
  Apache Aurora 0.8.0 release.
 
  Aurora 0.8.0-rc0 includes the following:
  ---
  The CHANGELOG for the release is available at:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.gitf=CHANGELOGhb=0.8.0-rc0
 
  The branch used to create the release candidate is:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.8.0-rc0
 
  The release candidate is available at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz
 
  The MD5 checksum of the release candidate can be found at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz.md5
 
  The signature of the release candidate can be found at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc
 
  The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/KEYS
 
  Please download, verify, and test.
 
  The vote will close on Thu May  7 22:35:17 EDT 2015
 
  [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0 because...
 
  I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
 
  -Jake
 




-- 
Kevin Sweeney
@kts


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 RC0

2015-05-05 Thread Kevin Sweeney
overall +0 - I'm okay with proceeding with the changelog as the only
deficiency

+1 java tests pass
+1 python test pass
+1 e2e tests pass
+0 changelog is incorrect as wfarner notes

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:

 -1 overall

 +1 checksums and signatures are good
 +1 unit tests and end-to-end tests pass
 -1 changelog contains tickets that were closed as won't fix.  i came up
 with a JIRA query [1] that seems to identify a bunch of these

 [1]

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AURORA%20AND%20fixVersion%3D0.8.0%20and%20resolution!%3Dfixed



 -=Bill

 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:

  All,
  I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official
  Apache Aurora 0.8.0 release.
 
  Aurora 0.8.0-rc0 includes the following:
  ---
  The CHANGELOG for the release is available at:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.gitf=CHANGELOGhb=0.8.0-rc0
 
  The branch used to create the release candidate is:
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.8.0-rc0
 
  The release candidate is available at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz
 
  The MD5 checksum of the release candidate can be found at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz.md5
 
  The signature of the release candidate can be found at:
 
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.8.0-rc0/apache-aurora-0.8.0-rc0.tar.gz.asc
 
  The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/KEYS
 
  Please download, verify, and test.
 
  The vote will close on Thu May  7 22:35:17 EDT 2015
 
  [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0 because...
 
  I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
 
  -Jake
 



Re: docker images dependencies

2015-05-05 Thread Steve Niemitz
You need libsvn-dev and libapr1-dev (on ubuntu) installed inside the
container, these are required by the mesos library.  Once pesos is ready
these dependencies will no longer be needed in the containers.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Mauricio Garavaglia 
mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi guys,

 What are the dependencies needed in the docker images to run it in aurora?
 I added python2.7 but the thermos executor fails for some images with
 thermos_executor.pex: error: Could not load MesosExecutorDriver! and the
 job gets lost.
 Are those dependencies documented somewhere? Thanks!



Re: recommended setting for max leading duration

2015-05-05 Thread Bill Farner
The defaults are reasonable.  I would not advise increasing
max_leading_duration dramatically, as the recovery time grows linearly with
the number of log writes due to MESOS-184 [1].


[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-184

-=Bill

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org wrote:

 What's the recommended setting for following parameters in a 5 scheduler
 quorum?
   -max_leading_duration (default: 24 hours)
   -backup_interval (default: 1 hour)

 --
 Regards,
 Bhuvan Arumugam
 www.livecipher.com



Health Checks for Updates design review

2015-05-05 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
Hi,

I have put together a design proposal for improving health-enabled job
update performance. Please, review and leave your comments:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdgW8S4xMhvKW7iQUX99xZm10NXSxEWR0a-21FP5d94/edit

Thanks,
Maxim


Re: Review Request 33854: Fix RC verification script.

2015-05-05 Thread Jake Farrell
there should not be any drift, this is just some cleanup based on us
learning from our first couple releases. Jenkins can not cut release as it
requires committing and signing, but jenkins does currently use the same
build script as this uses to test.

-Jake



On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Zameer Manji zma...@apache.org wrote:

 To prevent this drift of our release and verification infrastructure,
 should we have CI cut a release tarball and try to verify it with this
 script?

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:

 
  ---
  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
  https://reviews.apache.org/r/33854/
  ---
 
  Review request for Aurora and Jake Farrell.
 
 
  Repository: aurora
 
 
  Description
  ---
 
  Script has drifted over time, this makes it functional again.
 
 
  Diffs
  -
 
build-support/release/verify-release-candidate
  0d4d6e0c01ebe006056198d25b165b9658156653
 
  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33854/diff/
 
 
  Testing
  ---
 
  Ran it and verified 0.8.0.
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Bill Farner
 
  --
  Zameer Manji