Re: Moving forward on AURORA-1503

It seems that this is not a correct usage of semver and that we should release the link to 0.23.0 as 0.10.0. Given the mesos deprecation cycle described in that ticket, 0.22.0 would be compatible with 0.21.0. IMO a patch release should never break compatibility with versions that the previous

Re: [DRAFT] [REPORT] Apache Aurora

+1 On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Please take a moment to read through a draft of the board report i have > prepared for Aurora. I'm happy to take any suggestions for edits prior to > submitting this tomorrow. > > > ## Description: > - Apache Aurora

Re: Creating Aurora user@ and announcements@ lists?

+1 On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Zameer Manji wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mauricio Garavaglia < > mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Hussein Elgridly < > > huss...@broadinstitute.org > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.9.0 debs

+1 to these debs On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb > packaging for > Apache Aurora 0.9.0. > > > http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/ > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.9.0 debs

From my ASF email this time: +1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Kevin Sweeney kswee...@twitter.com wrote: +1 The one issue I have - thermos.pex seems to only appear in /usr/share/aurora/bin/thermos.pex and not as a globally-linked /usr/bin/thermos command. This makes it pretty

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.9.0 debs

not release these artifacts because... I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1 -=Bill -- Kevin Sweeney @kts

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora

Thanks for sending this out Josh! On Monday, August 17, 2015, Joshua Cohen jco...@twopensource.com wrote: No one with karma was around to kick off an official meeting, so we had an ad-hoc meeting. Here's the transcript: 11:01 jcohen: ASFBot: meeting start 11:01 ASFBot: You don't have enough

[PROPOSAL] Changes to the Python BUILD layout

I propose a simplification of the Python BUILD layout as follows and a set of new conventions, as follows: 1) 1 BUILD per 3rd level directory. These are currently ``` % find src/main/python -maxdepth 3 -mindepth 3 -type d |while read dirname; do echo $dirname | sed

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changes to the Python BUILD layout

Posted https://reviews.apache.org/r/36972/ for feedback. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote: +1 -=Bill On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kevin Sweeney kswee...@twitter.com.invalid wrote: Somewhat complementary work - this change would make

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changes to the Python BUILD layout

this effort against a tool change? -=Bill On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote: I propose a simplification of the Python BUILD layout as follows and a set of new conventions, as follows: 1) 1 BUILD per 3rd level directory. These are currently

Re: [PROPOSAL] Source releases vs artifact releases

+1 On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote: Hi folks, An issue that we have not yet officially addressed is release management as it pertains to binary artifacts we produce of Aurora. Today, when we cut a release, say 0.9.0, we essentially take a snapshot of

Re: Forking twitter-commons into our tree

+1, I suspect we'll find several things that can be replaced by the Java 8 standard library or newer versions of Guava and Guice. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Zameer Manji zma...@apache.org wrote: Just to be clear, I'm proposing forking the java parts only. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:06 AM,

Re: [jira] [Created] (AURORA-1375) When setting quota, the scheduler should prevent setting below current usage

thought this check should live in the admin client, but after discussing with [~zmanji], we believe the scheduler would be the right place to enforce this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) -- Kevin Sweeney @kts

Re: Culling items from 0.9.0 release

+1 On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote: Hey folks, I've moved the following tickets from the 0.9.0 release to the 0.10.0 release so that we may release in a more timely manner: AURORA-334 Replace in-memory storage with H2 This change is important, but ~entirely

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 API Artifacts

+1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: Nexus upload automatically does that -Jake On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote: It looks like there are checksums of the signatures, is that intentional? On Thu, Jun 11, 2015

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 API Artifacts

It looks like there are checksums of the signatures, is that intentional? On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: All, I have packaged up and staged the API jar/source artifacts from Apache Aurora 0.8.0 and deployed them to the Apache staging repo [1]. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 RC1

tests. Thanks, Jake! -=Bill On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Sorry ignore that I got my lists mixed up and thought the VOTE was sent to general@incubator. Thanks, Justin -- Kevin Sweeney @kts

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 RC0

[ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.8.0 because... I would like to get the voting started with my own +1 -Jake -- Kevin Sweeney @kts

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.8.0 RC0

overall +0 - I'm okay with proceeding with the changelog as the only deficiency +1 java tests pass +1 python test pass +1 e2e tests pass +0 changelog is incorrect as wfarner notes On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote: -1 overall +1 checksums and signatures are