Re: aurora job scalability

2016-03-21 Thread Matthias Veit
ff Software Engineer, Platform Services > > IBM Watson Core Technology > > > > > > -Matthias Veit <matth...@mesosphere.io> wrote: -To: > dev@aurora.apache.org > From: Matthias Veit <matth...@mesosphere.io> > Date: 03/21/2016 09:21AM >

Re: aurora job scalability

2016-03-19 Thread Bill Farner
> > Does job map to a Marathon application? I believe so, yes. An Aurora job is multiple replicas of a [group of] processes, usually (but not necessarily) homogeneous. If similar is there a known limitation to how many jobs one can have? This will depend on the hardware used for the

Re: aurora job scalability

2016-03-19 Thread Zameer Manji
I would like to chime in and just say from experience Aurora scales to the number of instances across all jobs. From a scale perspective there isn't much difference between having a thousand 1 instance jobs and a single job that has 1k instances as both cases roughly take up the same amount of

aurora job scalability

2016-03-19 Thread Christopher M Luciano
Hi all. It seems that we may be outgrowing Marathon. We have a problem with the amount of application that we are using, causing us to not exactly be "compliant" with Marathon goals. It seems that the unit for Aurora is a job+instance of that job. Does job map to a Marathon application? If

Re: aurora job scalability

2016-03-19 Thread Joshua Cohen
Hi Christopher, I think you already got an answer from Stephan in IRC, but just wanted to follow up for the sake of posterity (in case anyone in the future has a similar question and finds this thread). The only limit on the number of jobs that Aurora can run would currently be the amount of