> From: Farr, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I understand this and I just wanted clarification since in
> many cases it's a fine line between stating something is
> based on Avalon and stating it is endorsed by Avalon.
>
> In any case, back to my original query, it sounds like
> Phoenix
Farr, Aaron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The big thing is that you can't make it look like a project
is an official Apache or official Avalon project with the
same management board, etc. As long as you don't do that,
all is well.
And you can
> -Original Message-
> > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The big thing is that you can't make it look like a project
> > is an official Apache or official Avalon project with the
> > same management board, etc. As long as you don't do that,
> > all is well.
>
> An
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The big thing is that you can't make it look like a project
> is an official Apache or official Avalon project with the
> same management board, etc. As long as you don't do that,
> all is well.
And you can also not make it sound like Apa
Leo Sutic wrote:
Aaron,
I think the problem is "promotion":
From: J Aaron Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Projects derived from Avalon with a name that includes
Avalon, Phoenix,... ie- PhoenixJMS, AvalonJMX, AWF (Avalon
Web Framework), MyAvalon, etc.
Yes, this is a problem, since it im
> From: J Aaron Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 1. AFAIK it's a violation of the Avalon Phoenix license:
>
> The names "Avalon", "Phoenix" and "Apache Software Foundation"
> must not be used to endorse or promote products
> derived from this
> software without prior written
Aaron,
I think the problem is "promotion":
> From: J Aaron Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Projects derived from Avalon with a name that includes
> Avalon, Phoenix,... ie- PhoenixJMS, AvalonJMX, AWF (Avalon
> Web Framework), MyAvalon, etc.
Yes, this is a problem, since it implies tha
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 22:14, Peter Donald wrote:
>
> > - Use of any Apache or Avalon logos, icons, etc.
>
> Apache logos have a policy document describing usage but Avalon logos policy
> is decided by Avalon PMC.
So what does the PMC think about this:
http://jadetower.org/images/avalon-power.p
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:14 pm, Peter Donald wrote:
> > - Projects which state in their documentation things like:
> > "Based on Apache Avalon"
> > "Powered by Apache Avalon"
> > "Avalon compatible"
> > "Works with/in Apache Avalon Containers"
>
> Those are not compatible.
Should read "those
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:00 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote:
> Reason I'm cc'ing this to the dev list is because it addresses the larger
> question of Avalon based projects. If I understand correctly, the
> following are all not legit unless given permission:
>
> - Projects derived from Avalon with a name th
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 18:36, Alexis Agahi wrote:
> paul hammant is also very interested in having a phoenixjms upgraded & working.
Okay, I'll start working out a way to update cvs with the changes I
made. I'll probably send a specific email on that to you and paul
later.
I wanted to ask about t
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 06:43, J Aaron Farr wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Okay, it's not an official phoenixjms upgrade, since I haven't had
> anyone from that team respond to my emails (it's been a little while
> too), so technically this is a fork though I'd love to contribute it
> back to the project.
Hello.
Okay, it's not an official phoenixjms upgrade, since I haven't had
anyone from that team respond to my emails (it's been a little while
too), so technically this is a fork though I'd love to contribute it
back to the project.
Anyway, it's updated for openjms 0.7.5 and it runs in both phoen
13 matches
Mail list logo
