[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16151176#comment-16151176
]
Zoltan Farkas commented on AVRO-1340:
-
[~cutting] There is
This seems like a bug in the Java implementation, not a mistake in the
spec. Int->float promotion is supported elsewhere and, while lossy, has
always been in the spec. There are other lossy promotions (e.g.,
long->float) and dropping missing record fields is lossy, so lossiness
alone doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150660#comment-16150660
]
Nandor Kollar commented on AVRO-2069:
-
Perfect, looks good, tests are green again, thanks!
> Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150652#comment-16150652
]
Daniil Gitelson commented on AVRO-2069:
---
[~nkollar], fixed.
> Use primitive fields in generated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150636#comment-16150636
]
Nandor Kollar commented on AVRO-2069:
-
Ahhh, yes you're right, my bad, sorry for that! :)
> Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150594#comment-16150594
]
Daniil Gitelson commented on AVRO-2069:
---
[~nkollar], it is because recently you updated from legacy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150565#comment-16150565
]
Nandor Kollar commented on AVRO-2069:
-
[~dguitelson] looks like we still have test failures,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150549#comment-16150549
]
Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-2066:
---
thanks for the contribution! In the future, please generate your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Busbey updated AVRO-2066:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.8.3
1.9.0
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150545#comment-16150545
]
Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-2069:
---
excellent find Anna! I'll go read back through those discussions.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150547#comment-16150547
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-2066:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150536#comment-16150536
]
Anna Szonyi commented on AVRO-2069:
---
I looked at the git blame/history and it seems that it hasn't been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150533#comment-16150533
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-2066:
---
Commit
What's the rationale for not allowing it at all? Given that it's been in
the spec so long I'm hesitant to remove it.
I can't think of a time that we did a breaking change to the spec. Even if
we check all of our implementations, there's no way to know if someone else
has already created an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150514#comment-16150514
]
Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-2066:
---
+1 pushing shortly.
> Wrong schema file used in one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150510#comment-16150510
]
Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1891:
---
Can someone give me a synopsis of current status? do we believe this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16150481#comment-16150481
]
Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-2069:
---
we'll need to flag this as an incompatible change, but I agree that
17 matches
Mail list logo