I think this proposed logo looks better than the current one. Any official
avro members have an opinion?
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:48 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi Avro folks!
>
> I was wondering if it's worth cleaning up the Avro logo, making it a tad
> sharper?
> What I'm proposing is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421841#comment-16421841
]
Bridger Howell edited comment on AVRO-1340 at 4/1/18 11:06 PM:
---
# The current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421841#comment-16421841
]
Bridger Howell edited comment on AVRO-1340 at 4/1/18 11:06 PM:
---
# The current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421841#comment-16421841
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1340:
--
# The current PR looks like it has the parser treat anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421446#comment-16421446
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1340:
--
Well, looking the semantics for field defaults and enum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421446#comment-16421446
]
Bridger Howell edited comment on AVRO-1340 at 3/31/18 7:41 PM:
---
Well, looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421420#comment-16421420
]
Bridger Howell edited comment on AVRO-1340 at 3/31/18 6:13 PM:
---
[~felixgv]: I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421420#comment-16421420
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1340:
--
[~felixgv]: I don't think the semantics of this implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16421034#comment-16421034
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1340:
--
I think it's worth noting that new syntax isn't strictly
Not a committer, but I'd like to chime in and say that I'd absolutely love
to see another set of official releases soon.
When looking through the blockers in JIRA, AVRO-1810 and AVRO-1891 stand
out a bit - does anybody know if those issues should actually be considered
"blockers"?
Caveat here: I
Bridger Howell created AVRO-2159:
Summary: Naming Limitations of Schemas in Stricter Reference
Contexts
Key: AVRO-2159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2159
Project: Avro
Congrats Nándor!
I'm pretty new to Avro, but it's good to see people coming in who want to
help carry the project along.
I appreciate all the committers' dedication to Avro and look forward to
what comes next.
- Bridger Howell
--
The information contained in this email message is PRIVATE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16218615#comment-16218615
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2099:
--
[~KornelKielczewski] You mean the serializer should fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16217006#comment-16217006
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2099:
--
Good catch [~KornelKielczewski].
This is definitely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16216912#comment-16216912
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2028:
--
This looks like a duplicate of AVRO-1891.
> Specific D
ely, having some special syntax for human-readable defaults might
be okay, but I don't have any great suggestions.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Bridger Howell <bhow...@sofi.org> wrote:
>
>
; // default encoding being 'AVRO' default
> (e.g. binary)
> }
>
This has the same problem as one of my earlier suggestions; if you change
the meaning of the default field, then older readers will read the schema
with an incorrect default value.
- Bridger Howell
--
The information containe
e to a sense
that IDL isn't for writing schemas. If there was a more focused subset of
IDL that mapped directly onto schemas without some of the extra baggage, I
think it would be easier to recommend that as a high-level schema language.
- Bridger Howell
--
The information contained in this e
ty would do the trick too.
I think this type of approach keeps us neatly separated from logical types,
so that having a parser for a default value doesn't require a logical type,
and maybe makes it clearer which procedure is being performed on the JSON
data to convert it to the base field type.
-Bridger H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16205344#comment-16205344
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2079:
--
[~aukevanleeuwen]: I've looked over your PR and left a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16200271#comment-16200271
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2090:
--
This looks like a really good idea. If I have some free time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16189706#comment-16189706
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2077:
--
Finishing my last comment (whoops):
Of course there's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16189703#comment-16189703
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2077:
--
[~nkollar] I see your point. I see some value to having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bridger Howell updated AVRO-2080:
-
Flags: Patch
> Fix Javadoc Warnings in Generated Reco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bridger Howell updated AVRO-2080:
-
Flags: (was: Patch)
> Fix Javadoc Warnings in Generated Reco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16185883#comment-16185883
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2043:
--
[~lukejackson]: See AVRO-2079
> Move to ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16176463#comment-16176463
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2077:
--
Would it be strange to make this tool bidirectional? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bridger Howell updated AVRO-2080:
-
Attachment: Test.java
Reference: the generated source for that {{Test}} schema.
> Fix Java
Bridger Howell created AVRO-2080:
Summary: Fix Javadoc Warnings in Generated Records
Key: AVRO-2080
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2080
Project: Avro
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168107#comment-16168107
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2019:
--
Clarification on my previous comment: I do think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166847#comment-16166847
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1810:
--
No particular use case, I was just looking at the way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166383#comment-16166383
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-1810:
--
[~zolyfarkas] Would it be bad to interoperate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16159986#comment-16159986
]
Bridger Howell commented on AVRO-2019:
--
Isn't the way {{logicalType}} decorators work on types in IDL
33 matches
Mail list logo
