[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16094755#comment-16094755 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-1485: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16094750#comment-16094750 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-1485: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16094742#comment-16094742 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on AVRO-1485: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-19 Thread Suraj Acharya (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16093553#comment-16093553 ] Suraj Acharya commented on AVRO-1485: - * The tests on the master failed. Not sure what the reason for

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-19 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16093439#comment-16093439 ] Hadoop QA commented on AVRO-1485: - | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-19 Thread Gabor Szadovszky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092947#comment-16092947 ] Gabor Szadovszky commented on AVRO-1485: +1 > Specification says Record field type can be record

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-07-19 Thread Nandor Kollar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092826#comment-16092826 ] Nandor Kollar commented on AVRO-1485: - [~gszadovszky] could you please review this item? >

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-06-28 Thread John Gill (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16066538#comment-16066538 ] John Gill commented on AVRO-1485: - LGTM. Simple and clean > Specification says Record field type can be

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2017-06-28 Thread Nandor Kollar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16066080#comment-16066080 ] Nandor Kollar commented on AVRO-1485: - [~busbey] modified the doc according to Doug's comment, could

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2014-03-19 Thread Martin Kleppmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13940423#comment-13940423 ] Martin Kleppmann commented on AVRO-1485: I think you're right -- all

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2014-03-19 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13940491#comment-13940491 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1485: --- That's covered already in the A JSON object defining

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2014-03-19 Thread Martin Kleppmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13940562#comment-13940562 ] Martin Kleppmann commented on AVRO-1485: I read a JSON object as referring to the

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

2014-03-19 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13940660#comment-13940660 ] Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-1485: This is a bug in the specification. It should