o's dev-community's opinion on the merge strategy
> of pull requests. By default Github supports three options:
> - Create a merge commit
> - Squash and merge
> - Rebase and merge
> https://help.github.com/articles/about-merge-methods-on-github/
> <https://help.github.com/articles/
, signed commits,
> > “real” authors, or whatever criteria makes sense, then I’m all for it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Michael Smith/kojiromike
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 17:19 Driesprong, Fokko
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
&g
> > [image: image.png]
> >
> > I would like to get the Avro's dev-community's opinion on the merge
> > strategy of pull requests. By default Github supports three options:
> > - Create a merge commit
> > - Squash and merge
> > - Rebase and merge
> > h
Hi all,
Allow me to start the great debate.
[image: image.png]
I would like to get the Avro's dev-community's opinion on the merge
strategy of pull requests. By default Github supports three options:
- Create a merge commit
- Squash and merge
- Rebase and merge
https://help.github.com/articles