Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
If it is a known issue which is yet to be fixed (and not a regression), then it is fine - since we had it earlier as well I guess. Given that, I am +1 on release; though it would be nice to get it resolved given the mismatch in release artifacts. Thanks, Mridul On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:38 PM, T

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Ted Yu
I suggest getting BAHIR-88 fixed - this may affect future release(s). On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The issue reported was for Spark extensions > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 > > > And I guess it is a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Luciano Resende
The issue reported was for Spark extensions https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 And I guess it is also applicable for Flink extensions But the issue is still open. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > I would not consider them blocking

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Hi Luciano, I would not consider them blocking - but I wanted clarity about them, since I had seen jira's to the effect that they were fixed ? Not sure if I am misremembering ! Regards, Mridul On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Mridul

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > Hi, > > From the release tag, clean build and tests work fine, signatures match. > > The source at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/bahir-flink/1. > 0-rc5/ > has additional files which are not in repo: > > Not in repo ./