Re: BEAM-831 ParDo chaining for Apex runner

2017-03-09 Thread Chinmay Kolhatkar
Hi All, I did the implementation as you mentioned and created a PR ( https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2216) for CI and also for code related discussion. I'm writing unit tests for the code changes. If you get time, please have a look at the code and provide the feedback. Thanks in advance,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add 2.0.0 version in Jira

2017-03-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Fair enough, let's wait and as said, use the "First stable release" in Jira. Regards JB On 03/09/2017 11:04 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: I added "First stable release" in JIRA as a version identifier a while back, to avoid any prejudice what that version might be called. I think it makes sense to

Re: [Dev] GSoc 2017 "Beam Example(s) exploring public document datasets"

2017-03-09 Thread Milinda Kasun
Thanks for the quick reply Kenneth. Currently I am going through *Apache Beam* installation and referring Programming Guide and Documentation. Please update me if their any suggestions. On 10 March 2017 at 09:14, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hi Milinda, > > Glad you are

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #1

2017-03-09 Thread Ted Yu
bq. ran into a known issue [14] Currently BEAM-1674 is marked blocker. Would it be pushed to next release ? Cheers On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.6.0, > as

Re: [Dev] GSoc 2017 "Beam Example(s) exploring public document datasets"

2017-03-09 Thread Kenneth Knowles
Hi Milinda, Glad you are interested! I think it should be very fun and rewarding. The student application period for Google Summer of Code opens on March 20th, so be sure to apply then. I also recommend subscribing to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1439. I will add some details

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #1

2017-03-09 Thread Ted Yu
+1 Checked signature Ran test suite - all passed. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.6.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the

[Dev] GSoc 2017 "Beam Example(s) exploring public document datasets"

2017-03-09 Thread Milinda Kasun
Hi, I'm Milinda Kasun, I am a Final year undergraduate from the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka). I have experience on development with Java and Python. I would like do this project for GSoC 2017. It would be greatly appreciated if you could help

[VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #1

2017-03-09 Thread Ahmet Altay
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.6.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1], *

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add 2.0.0 version in Jira

2017-03-09 Thread Davor Bonaci
I added "First stable release" in JIRA as a version identifier a while back, to avoid any prejudice what that version might be called. I think it makes sense to resolve (newly fixed) issues against that version. Once we finalize the name of that release, we can easily rename it to either "1.0.0"

Re: Add GitHub topics to Beam repository

2017-03-09 Thread Davor Bonaci
We certainly cannot do this ourselves, but it is within the realm of possibility that Apache Infra can assign tags to our GitHub repositories. Looking at the tags that already exist, perhaps we could go with: * apache-beam * big-data * data-processing * data-analysis * data-science *

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add 2.0.0 version in Jira

2017-03-09 Thread Amit Sela
Well, for now at least. We have to use something for fixed issues.. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:32 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > By the way, waiting the end of this discussion, we can use "First stable > release" as version in Jira. > > Regards > JB > > On 03/09/2017 07:21

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add 2.0.0 version in Jira

2017-03-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
By the way, waiting the end of this discussion, we can use "First stable release" as version in Jira. Regards JB On 03/09/2017 07:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, Release branch for 0.6.0 has been created but the next cycle version has not been created in Jira. I propose to create

Re: Add GitHub topics to Beam repository

2017-03-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Aviem, thanks for the hit ! I thought about reviewers feature too but it requires "write" access to github, which is not possible as github is just a mirror of Apache git. Regards JB On 03/09/2017 01:31 PM, Aviem Zur wrote: About a month ago GitHub introduced topics, which let GitHub

Add GitHub topics to Beam repository

2017-03-09 Thread Aviem Zur
About a month ago GitHub introduced topics, which let GitHub users query for repositories by topics (domains that the repos deal with). We can leverage these to increase Beam's exposure on GitHub. Example topics we could add: big-data, google-cloud-dataflow, spark, flink, apex, gearpump We can

Fwd: Jenkins build is still unstable: beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Flink #1866

2017-03-09 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
I'm looking into the recent streak of unstable builds. - Original message - From: Apache Jenkins Server To: comm...@beam.apache.org, k...@google.com, al...@google.com Subject: Jenkins build is still unstable: beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Flink #1866

Re: [BEAM-135] Utilities for "batching" elements in a DoFn

2017-03-09 Thread Etienne Chauchot
Hi all, We had a discussion with Kenn yesterday about point 1 bellow, I would like to note it here on the ML: Using new method timer.set() instead of timer.setForNowPlus() makes the timer fire at the right time. Another thing, regarding point 2: if I inject the window in the @Ontimer