Hi guys,
just a quick update about Jenkins and GitHub integration.
After working with INFRA, the issue has been identified and fixed (the
permissions got a bit messed up in the last week which is why it stopped
working). We fixed the credentials with INFRA and now, all is back to normal.
We
I think having runners report important, general properties such as the
source watermark is great. It is much easier than requiring every source to
expose it.
I'm not sure how we would require this or do so in a general way. Each
runner has seperate code for handling the watermark as well as
Hi,
Thanks for reviving this thread. I think having the watermark is very good.
Some runners, for example Dataflow and Flink have their own internal metric for
the watermark but having it cross-runner seems beneficial (if maybe a bit
wasteful).
Best,
Aljoscha
> On 2. Jun 2017, at 03:52,
