Re: [VOTE] Release 2.9.0, release candidate #1

Udi or anybody else who is familiar about Nexmark, please -1 the vote thread if you think this particular performance regression for Spark/Direct runners is a blocker. Otherwise I think we can continue the vote. Thanks, Cham On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:19 PM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Are

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.9.0, release candidate #1

Are either of these regressions due to known issues ? If not should they be considered release blockers ? Thanks, Cham On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:11 PM Udi Meiri wrote: > For DirectRunner there are regressions in query 7 sql direct runner batch > mode >

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.9.0, release candidate #1

For DirectRunner there are regressions in query 7 sql direct runner batch mode (2x) and streaming mode (5x). On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Udi Meiri wrote: > I see a regression for query 7 spark

Re: Reviews for a few changes to the Go SDK

Hi Andrew, Following up, I reviewed both changes. Left a comment for the first one, and merged the second one. Let me know if you need additional help. Ahmet On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > +Robert Burke (assignee for the both JIRAs) would be a > better

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.9.0, release candidate #1

I see a regression for query 7 spark runner batch mode on about 2018-11-13. [image: image.png] On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:46 AM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on

Re: Jira

Welcome, I have added you. On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:12 AM Dustin Rhodes wrote: > Hi, > > This Dustin from Google. I'm working on the Dataflow Runner. Can someone > add me as a contributor for Beam's Jira issue tracker? I would like to be > able to assign this Jira issue I created to myself >

Re: GSOC - Summer of Code, on Beam?

On 2018/12/05 00:29:48, Pablo Estrada wrote: > Hi Austin! > Thanks a lot for surfacing this. I participated in GSOC as a student a > couple times, and loved it. This being my first time around as a committer, > I'm excited to try and help. > > I think, for starters, it may be good to find

Jira

Hi, This Dustin from Google. I'm working on the Dataflow Runner. Can someone add me as a contributor for Beam's Jira issue tracker? I would like to be able to assign this Jira issue I created to myself https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6190 . My Jira ID is dustin12. Thanks! Dustin

Re: org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest is very flakey

Hi Alex, Thank you for your PR. I agree PAssert is much nicer. You're right. Despite the source not being executed in parallel, the results of the source will then be distributed round-robin to all the other tasks. Note that there is no GroupBy operation. Thanks for spotting the issue. I

[VOTE] Release 2.9.0, release candidate #1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.9.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],