I see most of the release validations have been completed and marked in the
spreadsheet. Thank you all for doing that. If you have not validated/voted
yet please take a look at the release candidate.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 7:59 AM Thomas Weise wrote:
> I think there is a different reason why
Currently the CassandraIO connector allows a user to specify a table, and
the CassandraSource object generates a list of queries based on token
ranges of the table, along with grouping them by the token ranges.
I often need to run (generated, sometimes a million+) queries against a
subset of a
Some links for reference:
https://www.outreachy.org/docs/applicant/#outreachy-schedule
https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/apache/
Kenn
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> I submitted an Outreachy project proposal on behalf of Apache Beam(it's
> related
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:35 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> For this specific usecase, I would suggest this be done via
> PTranform URNs. E.g. one could have a GroupByKeyOneShot whose
> implementation is
>
> input
> .apply(GroupByKey.of()
> .apply(kv -> KV.of(kv.key(), kv.iterator())
>
This
Hi Ismael,
Sorry I wasn't aware that you also has a project. Carlos has contacted me
on SQL before. Next time I will ask people to also include their interest
of project in introduction emails.
-Rui
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:47 AM Rui Wang wrote:
> Hi Isamel,
>
> Carlos is an Outreachy
Hi Isamel,
Carlos is an Outreachy applicant so I will take care of starter tasks.
-Rui
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:31 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Hello Carlos!
>
> Just added you as a contributor so you can self assign the tickets you
> want to work on
> What project are you interested in?
>
>
Ok - now I see what you're talking about. You are focusing on the Java
types in the Java SDK, where the output of GBK is an Iterable type (which
should always be reiterable). I was talking more abstractly about the
programming model, i.e. the portability representation of the graph.
In this case
** Bumping this thread especially if you are an IO author **
Really glad you are working on this. The basic idea in your doc seems good.
It seems mostly that Beam SQL contributors have commented on it. There are
many more people who may be interested in this and have valuable feedback,
such as
Putting a stateful dofn after a GBK is not completely redundant - the
element type changes, so it is different than just having .a stateful dofn.
However it is a weird thing to do, and usually not optimal (especially
because many runners might insert two shuffles in this case).
On Wed, Oct 2,
I think there is a different reason why the release manager should probably
merge/approve all PRs that go into the release branch while the release is
in progress:
If/when the need arises for another RC, then only those changes should be
included that are deemed blockers or explicitly agreed.
Welcome, Maria!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:40 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Hello and welcome Maria!
>
> Great to see you at dev@. Thanks for sharing the link on the comm
> framework. Now I am curious on what's next and how this will adapt to
> our community.
>
> Ismaël.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at
Hello and welcome Maria!
Great to see you at dev@. Thanks for sharing the link on the comm
framework. Now I am curious on what's next and how this will adapt to
our community.
Ismaël.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:15 AM María Cruz wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> my name is María Cruz, I am from Buenos
Hello Carlos!
Just added you as a contributor so you can self assign the tickets you
want to work on
What project are you interested in?
Regards,
Ismaël
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Carlos Oceguera wrote:
>
> I forgot to add my jira user: "chefoce", sorry
>
> -- Forwarded message
Hi Tim,
can you please elaborate more about some parts?
1) What happens actually in your case? What is the specific settings you
use?
3) Can you share stacktrace? Is it always the same, or does it change?
The mentioned GroupCombineFunctions.java:202 comes from a Reshuffle,
which seems to
We do have 2.15.0 Beam batch jobs running on Spark runner. I did have a bit
of tricky time with spark.default.parallelism, but at the end it works fine
for us (custom parallelism on source stages and spark.default.parallelism
on all other stages after shuffles)
Tricky part in my case was
Hi Mujuzi Moses,
Welcome! I've given you contributor permissions in JIRA.
Cheers,
Max
On 03.10.19 01:07, Mujuzi Moses wrote:
Hello, i am requesting to be added to the contributors list, i am an
Outreachy applicant,
Regards,
Mujuzi Moses
JIRA Username: iamMujuziMoses
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019,
> For the next time, may I suggest asking release manager to do the
> merging to the release branch. We do not know whether there will be an
> RC2 or not. And if there will not be an RC2 release branch as of now
> does not directly correspond to what will be released.
The ground truth for
Hello, i am requesting to be added to the contributors list, i am an
Outreachy applicant,
Regards,
Mujuzi Moses
JIRA Username: iamMujuziMoses
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 10:10 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Welcome to dev@beam! And thanks for the interesting link.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at
Username: iamMujuziMoses
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 11:47 PM Rui Wang wrote:
> Can you copy your username? That link directs me to my own profile.
>
> -Rui
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Mujuzi Moses wrote:
>
>> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 2,
Hi my name is Carlos, i'm from Mexico, i want to contribute in the project,
i will very grateful for the opportunity.
I forgot to add my jira user: "chefoce", sorry
-- Forwarded message -
De: Carlos Oceguera
Date: jue., 3 de octubre de 2019 12:24 a. m.
Subject: Outreachy applicant
To:
Hi my name is Carlos, i'm from Mexico, i want to contribute in the project,
i will very grateful for the
21 matches
Mail list logo
