I haven't heard anyone suggest that we need a vote. I haven't heard anyone
object to this being merged to master. Some time ago, we mostly decided to
favor master instead of branches, because it is so much smoother for
contributors and users.
So I am poking this thread one last time and otherwise
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 1:55 PM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Kenn can you adjust the script to match only source code files
> ... otherwise it produces a lot of extra false positives
I think the sheet only had false matches in build/ directories. Removed.
Can you comment on other cells that look like
Kenn can you adjust the script to match only source code files: `--include
\*.java --include \*.py --include \*.go` otherwise it produces a lot of extra
false positives due to html files and cache files. Also can we extract the full
annotation as a column so we can filter/group for the full kind
I don’t believe that it was ever resolved. I have a PR with a bunch of
attempts to get it working but I never did figure it out. IIRC there did
seem to be some ansi plugin already installed but I couldn’t get it to
work.
-chad
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:52 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Did this
Did this ever happen? If not what is blocking it?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:13 PM Udi Meiri wrote:
>
> Your proposal will only affect the seed job (which doesn't do color outputs
> AFAIK).
> I think you want to add colorizeOutput() here:
>
