https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012319527%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012349629%20AND%20statusCategory%20%3D%20%22To%20Do%22%20%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20key%20ASC
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:43 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Correction: that search did not limit to
Correction: that search did not limit to open issues. There are 17 open.
Kenn
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:42 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Update: I cut the branch today.
>
> There are 49 (!) issues with Fix Version = 2.29.0
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012319527%
Update: I cut the branch today.
There are 49 (!) issues with Fix Version = 2.29.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012319527%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012349629%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20key%20ASC
If you are familiar with any of these, please help me by determi
Hi all,
Thanks to those who contributed. I've submitted the report.
I have started the doc for the next one _now_ so as things happen over the
next quarter we can add to it. This is similar to CHANGES.md in spirit, so
we don't have to gather info after the fact quite so much. But more focused
on
Hi all,
You may or may not think about this very often, but our Jira workflow goes
like this:
Needs Triage --> Open --> In Progress --> Resolved
"Needs Triage" means someone needs to look at it briefly:
- component(s)
- label(s)
- issue type
- priority (see https://beam.apache.org/contribut
+user
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
Sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have been supporting old
Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
> previous
> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
> releases
> [1].
>
> I would
Hello,
We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
[1].
I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of cou
