Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.41.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
candidate, and vote +1 if no
Hi, Ahmet，
Thank you for reaching out. We will definitely post the consensus we
reached at the meeting here and determine when it will be held,.
Now waiting for Brittany, and Danielle to reply when it is convenient for
the meeting
Ahmet Altay 于2022年8月12日周五 10:45写道：
> Thank you Niko, Brittany,
Thank you Niko, Brittany, Danielle. Sharing about Beam in different regions
sounds like a good idea.
Once you have a call, could you please summarize your discussion and the
next steps here?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 9:37 PM 曾辉 wrote:
> The following is our detailed introduction
>
> 曾辉
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 8:50 AM Yi Hu via dev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tl;dr There are two (or three) different representations used for the URN
> "beam:logical_type:datetime:v1" in Beam Java SDK. Clarification or clean up
> is needed.
>
> I recently try to resolve a long-time issue
>
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>
Hi,
tl;dr There are two (or three) different representations used for the URN
"beam:logical_type:datetime:v1" in Beam Java SDK. Clarification or clean up
is needed.
I recently try to resolve a long-time issue
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/19817 for the datetime logical type
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need
attention.
See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and
expectations around issue priorities.
Unassigned P0 Issues:
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/22606 [Bug]: The
