Re: [DISCUSSION][JAVA] Current state of Java 17 support

2022-11-29 Thread Tomo Suzuki via dev
> Do we still need to support Java 8 SDK? Yes, for Google Cloud customers who still use Java 8, I want Apache Beam to support Java 8. Do you observe any special burden maintaining Java 8? Regards, Tomo On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 21:48 Austin Bennett wrote: > -1 for ongoing Java8 support [ or,

Re: [DISCUSSION][JAVA] Current state of Java 17 support

2022-11-29 Thread Austin Bennett
-1 for ongoing Java8 support [ or, said another way, +1 for dropping support of Java8 ] +1 for having tests that run for ANY JDK that we say we support. Is there any reason the resources to support are too costly [ or outweigh the benefits of additional confidence in ensuring we support what we

Re: Issue with website update and Jenkins

2022-11-29 Thread Alexey Romanenko
It looks that there is again the same issue with beam_PostCommit_Website_Publish job - the last successful build was 6 days ago. Could someone take a look on this? Thanks, Alexey > On 11 Oct 2022, at 19:23, David Huntsperger via dev > wrote: > > Thank you! > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:18

[DISCUSSION][JAVA] Current state of Java 17 support

2022-11-29 Thread Alexey Romanenko
Hello, I’m sorry if it’s already discussed somewhere but I find myself a little bit lost in the subject. So, I’d like to clarify this - what is a current official state of Java 17 support at Beam? I recall that a great job was done to make Beam compatible with Java 17 [1] and Beam already

Beam High Priority Issue Report (62)

2022-11-29 Thread beamactions
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/24389 [Failing Test]: